Sunday, 17 July 2016

PAF C-130 wins best aircraft trophy


ISLAMABAD: The PAF C-130 aircraft won the Concours D' Elegance trophy for being the best aircraft of the Royal International Air Tattoo Show 2016 at Royal Air Force Base Fair Ford UK.
According to a press release, more than 50 nations with 200 aircraft from across the world competed for the coveted trophy; however, the PAF C-130 stole the show with its attractive Zarb-e-Azb theme colours.
On the final day of the Show, Air Marshal Asad Lodhi, Vice Chief of the Air Staff, visited the venue and congratulated the PAF air and ground crew for winning the prestigious trophy and bringing laurels to the country.
Talking to the PAF contingent, he appreciated their untiring efforts for achieving this honour and said that this great achievement would go a long way in projecting the soft image of the country across the world.
The PAF C-130 continued to attract large crowds on the last day of the show as well and people tried to catch a glimpse of the display aircraft painted in Zarb-e-Azb theme. They were also briefed about the pivotal role of PAF in the success of the Operation Zarb-e-Azb against the terrorist elements in Pakistan.
The PAF C-130 aircraft, which was specially painted to highlight the sacrifices of Pakistani people and the armed forces in the Operation Zarb-e-Azb, arrived at Royal Air Force Base, Fairford (UK) to participate in the Royal International Air Tattoo Show-2016.
The PAF contingent consisting of air and ground crew participated in various competitions and events organised at the Royal International Air Tattoo Show-2016.
This is the second time that PAF has won this prestigious trophy as PAF C-130 had participated in this event in July 2006 as well and won three major trophies of the competition.


Heroes are not pawns: Army officer's daughter exposes pseudo nationals


'I love our defence force, but I'm critical about how it functions in Kashmir.'

Donita Angela  
Just to widen this nationalism versus jingoism debate.
I'm the daughter of an Army officer and I would never let anybody undermine the agonies of an Army man who guards his nation by keeping his own body at the border! Since childhood I've heard endless stories of war times, of bravery, of how he survived on extremely low quantities of food in unimaginably cold weathers.
I've also heard of the rigours of times, and of times when war was over and only a cold memory remained, when soldiers returned home but their sleeps were scarred with splatters of blood and sounds of the cannon going off every minute.
I was too small the last time he had to report for war, but I remember not seeing my father for months together. Twenty-seven years have passed and my father still serves in the Army, and has made me believe it's one of the toughest and most efficient institutions in the country.
Having said that, it doesn't mean that an average citizen like me can't discuss (anything) about the nation; for not having put my life on the frontier too. I can complain, deliberate, ridicule, praise, sympathise, empathise with any idea that's in tune with causing no destruction to the society. To put in simple words, I can empathise with Kashmir.
I love the Army, but I'm critical about how it functions in Kashmir. To have to live in a state with constant surveillance and seeing guns at every corner is suffocating. Three weeks of struggle for Rohith Vemula at campus was enough of seeing the lathis and tear gas vans.
Imagine being born into it, being a terror suspect for existing, being checked, being enslaved to a nation that does all this and more in the name of your security. While the rest of the country protests against beef ban and censor board, Kashmir's definition of liberty is still stuck at demanding the abolishing of AFSPA, and freedom of movement.
Is it possible to love the Army and feel the angst of Kashmiris, Manipuris, Dalits, tribals, et al?
Yes, which is why my anger directs to the state, to the government which is using Army as a pawn to reinforce its nationalism and cover up its misgovernance. It's easy to hail the Army and forget what they were fighting for.
Is it justified when they fight poor tribals who've been denied rights on the forests that were a part of their existence for centuries? Is such a soldier less of a soldier for fighting his own people?
I'm amazed how the nation remembers the Army only to get a dirty pleasure in claiming its nationalism: "Look at our soldiers. Guarding our borders blah blah..." or when a natural calamity (strikes). Why didn't anybody give some thought to them when One Rank One Pension had to be sealed by the government and our veterans went on a series of hunger strikes?
Dear jingoistic/pseudo nationals, don't drag the Army into this dirty game. Specially you, Mr Arnab Goswami.
In tune with what Umar Khalid and what Kashmiris demand, I read this quote on Scroll.in regarding AFSPA.
Resting my case with this.
A retired Army officer once recounted: "Sometimes we behaved like militants and the militants like security forces. The state machinery was perceived as a tool of oppression and seldom seen as a guardian. AFSPA is a bad Act. But if you remove AFSPA, the Army will lose whereas if you continue with AFSPA for 25 years then India is surely losing the war."


Martyrs’ Day: Genesis of the Kashmir’s Struggle


  By Sajjad Shaukat

The Martyrs’ Day, known as Youme Shuhada-e-Kashmir is observed on July 13 every year on both sides of the Line of Control and all over the world by the Kashmiris to pay homage to 22 Kashmiris who were martyred in 1931 to free Kashmir from the brutalities of despotic Dogra rulers. The day is the milestone in the history, as it has become genesis of the Kashmir’s struggle for independence against foreign occupation.

However, the history of Dogra rule (1846-1947) in Kashmir is replete with tyrannous treatment, meted out to the Kashmiri Muslims by Dogra forces. Under the Dogra rule, they were leading so miserable life that it was difficult to differentiate them from beasts. Slave labour, heavy taxes, capital punishment for cow slaughter, and living under constant terror was order of the day.

In this regard, Yousaf Saraf in his book, “Kashmiris Fight for Freedom” calls it “free forced labour” and “instead of donkeys and horses, Kashmiri Muslims were used for transportation of goods across the far-flung areas.” In this context, while describing the pathetic picture of the Kashmiris, in his book, “The India We Served”, Sir Walter Lawrence writes, “Army was employed in forcing the villagers to plough and sow, and worse still, the soldiers came at harvest time and when the share of the state had been seized” and “there was very little grain to tide the unfortunate peasants over the cruel winter.”

On April 19, 1931, the ban of Eid Khutba (Sermon) ignited widespread demonstrations in the Jummu city for a number of days. It was followed by desecration of the Holy Quran at the hands of Dogra forces, which resulted into outrage among the Muslims throughout the state. In Srinagar, people gathered in Jamia Masjid to denounce this blasphemy. One such get-together was held in Khankah-e-Muella Srinagar, which was addressed by prominent Kashmiris. When the meeting was concluded, a youth, Abdul Qadeer, pointing his finger to the Maharaja’s palace, raised slogans “destroy its every brick.” With the accusation of sedition, he was arrested forthwith. Abdul Qadir was to be tried in the court, but due to large public resentment, the court was shifted to Central Jail Srinagar.

On July 12, 1931, in response to the shifting of court, intense public protests were held throughout the city. The next day, on July 13, 1931, thousands of people thronged the Central Jail Srinagar to witness the in-camera trial of Abdul Qadeer. As the time for obligatory prayer approached, a young Kashmiri stood for Azan. The Dogra Governor, Ray Zada Tartilok Chand ordered soldiers to open fire at him. When he got martyred, another young man took his place and started Azan. He was also shot dead. In this way, 22 Kashmiris embraced martyrdom in their efforts to complete the Azan. The people carried the dead and paraded through the streets of Srinagar, chanting slogans against Dogra brutalities. Complete strike was observed in the city, which was followed by weeklong mourning. This incident shook the whole state and the traffic from Srinagar to Rawalpindi and Srinagar to Jammu came to halt from July 13 to 26, 1931. The 22 martyrs are buried in Martyrs’ Graveyard at Khawaja Bazar, Srinagar.

Consequent upon these brutal killings, the Kashmiri leadership realized the need to form a political party, Muslim Conference (MC) with a view to waging struggle for their freedom. Later, in 1934, state’s first elections were held and MC won 10 out of 21 seats, and after two years in 1936, it succeeded in getting 19 out of 21 seats. Indian Congress was upset with this situation and tried to create division in the ranks of Kashmiri leadership. Afterwards, on July 19, 1947, MC passed a resolution to merge Kashmir with Pakistan, considering the geographical proximity—majority of Muslim population (77%), language and cultural relations of Jammu and Kashmir.

Ironically, despite a lapse of 66 years, Kashmiris are still struggling and sacrificing to achieve their alienable right under the UN resolutions for the plebiscite in Jammu and Kashmir. Kashmir Valley is one of the most heavily militarized regions in the world with Indian 7 million armed security forces which are perpetrating various forms of state terrorism on the innocent Kashmiris. Since 1989, a deliberate campaign by the Indian army and paramilitary forces against the Kashmiris has been manifested in brutal tactics such as crackdowns, curfews, illegal detentions, massacre, targeted killings, sieges, burning the houses, torture, disappearances, rape, breaking the legs, molestation of Muslim women and killing of persons through fake encounter.

According to a report on human rights violations in the Indian Occupied Kashmir, since 1989, there have been deaths of 1,00000 innocent Kashmiris, 7,023 custodial killings, 1,22,771 arrests, 1,05,996 destruction of houses or buildings, 22,776 women widowed, 1,07,466 children orphaned and 10,086 women gang-raped/molested. Indian brutal securities forces have continue these atrocities.

Besides Human Rights Watch, in its various reports, Amnesty International has also pointed out grave human rights violations in the Indian controlled Kashmir, indicating, “The Muslim majority population in the Kashmir Valley suffers from the repressive tactics of the security forces. Under the Jammu and Kashmir Disturbed Areas Act, and the Armed Forces (Jammu and Kashmir) Special Powers Act and Public Safety Act, security forces personnel have extraordinary powers to shoot suspected persons.”

In its report on July 2, 2015, the Amnesty International has highlighted extrajudicial killings of the innocent persons at the hands of Indian security forces in the Indian Held Kashmir. The report points out, “Tens of thousands of security forces are deployed in Indian-administered Kashmir…the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) allows troops to shoot to kill suspected militants or arrest them without a warrant…not a single member of the armed forces has been tried in a civilian court for violating human rights in Kashmir…this lack of accountability has in turn facilitated other serious abuses…India has martyred one 100,000 people. More than 8,000 disappeared (while) in the custody of army and state police.”

In this respect, European Union passed a resolution on May 11, 2011 about human rights abuses committed by Indian forces in the Indian held Kashmir.

Particularly, in 2008, a rights group reported unnamed graves in various regions of the Indian occupied Kashmir. In this context, in August, 2011, Indian Jammu and Kashmir State Human Rights Commission (SHRC) officially acknowledged in its report that innocent civilians killed in the two-decade conflict have been buried in unmarked graves. Notably, foreign sources and human rights organizations including Association of Parents of Disappeared Persons (APDP) have disclosed that unnamed graves include thousands of persons, killed by the Indian forces in the fake encounters including those who were tortured to death by Indian secret agency RAW.

In its report China’s leading News Agency Xinhua has unearthed more gruesome details on world-stunning unmarked graves in Poonch of the Indian occupied Kashmir. The report revealed the statement of Sofi Aziz Joo, caretaker of a graveyard as saying, “Police and Army used to bring those bodies and direct me to bury them. The bodies were usually bullet-ridden, mutilated, faces disfigured and sometimes without limbs and heads.”

It seems that non-condemnation of these Indian massive human rights violations and non-interference for the settlement of this issue by the so-called civilized international community, especially the US have further encouraged New Delhi to keep on going with its state terrorism on the armless Kashmiri masses. Ignorance of the issue by them involves the risk of nuclear war between Pakistan and India.

Indian authorities are not willing to talk with Kashmiri people on political grounds. New Delhi reached to a conclusion that only bullet is the right way of dealing with Kashmiris, demanding their right of self-determination. Surprisingly, Indian successive governments are trying to ignore the dynamics of the freedom movement of Kashmiris for the sake of their alien rule.

It is notable that dialogue between India and Pakistan took place on a number of occasions, but produced no outcome, prolonging the agony of the subjugated people of the occupied Kashmir due to Indian intransigence.

Nevertheless, observance of Kashmiris’ freedom struggle during the Martyrs’ Day, every year is reaffirmation of the fact that Kashmiris will continue to fight against Indian illicit occupation. In this context, Youme Shuhada-e-Kashmir is an ideal day for Kashmiris to seek inspiration to take their war of liberation to its logical end. At this time of distress, the people of Pakistan’s side are sharing the grief of Kashmiri freedom lovers. Pakistan also observes Youme Shudaha-e-Kashmir on July 13, launching a protest against the oppressive polices of Indian occupation, which have continued against the hapless Kashmiris.

Nonetheless, on July 13, all over the world, Kashmiris renew their pledge to continue the ongoing war of liberation for the accomplishment of their right of self-determination and for the independence of Kashmir from the despotic Indian rulers who continue state terrorism in the Indian-controlled Kashmir like the Dogra rulers. In these terms, Martyrs’ Day has become genesis of the Kashmir’s Struggle for independence.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com


Dhaka Restaurant Attack: Another False Flag Operation

By Sajjad Shaukat

The militants attacked on the Holey Artisan Bakery (Restaurant) in the diplomatic district of Dhaka on July 2, this year and killed at least 20 hostages and two police officers. It includes nine Italians, seven Japanese and one American.

The Islamic State group (Also known as Daesh, ISIS, ISIL) claimed responsibility for terror attack on the restaurant. But, without any investigation, Home Minister of Bangladesh Asaduzzaman Khan blamed home-grown Islamist terrorists and Pakistan’s intelligence agency ISI for the restaurant assault by adding, “There is no IS or al-Qaeda presence in Bangladesh…the hostage-takers were all home-grown terrorists and not members of IS or any other international Islamist outfits.” His statement was contrary to the country’s top officials who have claimed that ISIS exists in Bangladesh. ISI has accepted responsibility for a number of past attacks in Bangladesh. On July 7, 2016, terrorists killed two policemen and a woman in an attack at Eid congregation near Sholakia Eidgah in Kishoreganj, Bangladesh. The incident came, a day after the ISI video on social media in which, three Bangladeshi youths appeared, threatening more attacks in the country, as the sources of Bangladesh disclosed. It also proves that Bangladesh’s home-grown militants have connections with the ISIL. However, availing the opportunity of the Dhaka restaurant attack, Indian media also began a campaign, accusing ISI.

Western analysts opine that ISIL was behind the recent terror attacks in Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Bangladesh and Iraq which killed scores of people. These analysts said, “ISIS, now under pressure in its core territory of Iraq and Syria from where their militants are on flee owing to the successful military operations led by Russian-supported forces. The group has started missions elsewhere in the world.”

In fact, there is a co- relationship of the double game and false flag operations. Indian secret agency RAW which is in connivance with the intelligence agencies of Bangladesh, and has been using the ISIL terrorists, is behind the restaurant attack of Dhaka in order to distort the image of Pakistan and ISI. Therefore, it was a false flag operation.

As regards the false flag operations, shooting at the night club in Orlando may be noted as an instance. In this context, on June 28, 2016, The New York Times wrote, “The mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Fla., on June 12 included a curious phrase:  false flag…The victims in the shooting? They were “crisis actors” hired to promote the story as a pretext to impose tighter gun restrictions, the theory goes…the term false flag relates to naval warfare when a ship would fly a flag that would conceal its true identity as a way to lure an enemy closer. Today, it is commonly a shorthand for an act of deception…conspiracy theorists have applied the label to high-profile attacks, including the shootings by a husband and wife last year in San Bernardino, Calif, that killed 14…the phrase has even been used to doubt the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.”

Some other developments also endorsed the false flag operation of the Orlando club. In an interview with Brazilian TV on June 14, 2016, the ex-wife of the Orlando shooter Omar Mateen Sitora Yusufiy revealed that American FBI pressurized her to keep quiet about his homosexuality. Since the attack, Mateen has been dubbed an Islamic terrorist by the politicians, senior officials and commentators in the US, following reports he had pledged allegiance to the ISIL, as they wanted to downplay the personal and self-hating nature of the assault so as to obtain several secret aims of America, Israel, India and some European countries against Russia, Pakistan and Syria where these US-led entities are also supporting the ISIL militants to oust the government of President Bashar al-Assad. Hence, American CIA and Israeli Mossad and Indian RAW are in collusion with the ISIS militants to obtain the collective and individual interests of their countries against Pakistan, China, Iran and other Muslim countries.

Besides, Israel, India and Zionist lobbies which are clandestinely assisting America’s anti-Muslim, pro-Israeli and pro-Indian Donald J. Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee want to see him as the president of the United States.

Dhaka restaurant attack is also part of some other interrelated developments in the region which also need attention to know the double game. On January 13, 2015, at least seven personnel of the Afghan security forces died during the suicide attack which targeted the Pakistani consulate in Jalalabad. The ISIL claimed responsibility for the terror assault which coincided with efforts to restart the suspended peace process with Taliban insurgents. Pakistani sources suggested that Indian RAW was behind this terror attack to thwart these peace talks. On May 21, 2016, the CIA-operated drone strike killed the Chief of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Akhtar Mansour in Nushki, Balochistan province of Pakistan. After the incident, Afghan Taliban leaders refused to participate in the US-sponsored talks with the Afghan government. While, in the recent past, with the help of Pakistan, a series of meetings were held in Islamabad and Kabul among the representatives of Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and the US to develop an understanding for the earliest possible resumption of stalled talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban with view to ending nearly 15 years of bloodshed in Afghanistan. This latest strike by the US predator in Balochistan gave a greater setback to peace process for Afghanistan under the Quadrilateral Coordination Group framework.

However, it shows that America is playing double game with Islamabad. Undoubtedly, secret agents of CIA, Mossad and RAW which are well-penetrated in the ISIS, the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are using the militants of these terrorist outfits to destabilize Tibetan regions of China, Iranian Sistan-Baluchistan, Pakistan’s province of Balochistan and Central Asia. In this connection, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is their special target.

It is of particular attention the since Bangladesh’s Awami League came into power, by following Indian directions, Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajid has started a deliberate propaganda campaign against Pakistan, its army and particularly Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

In this context, on the direction of India, unlike the past years, a ceremony was held in Dhaka on March 24, 2013, with full pump and show to honour ‘Foreign Friends of Bangladesh Award,’ in relation to the crisis which led to the separation of East Pakistan in 1971. For the purpose, Awami League and its leader, Prime Minister Hasina are propagating against Islamabad through a well thought-out media plan in order to spread venom against Pakistan, its armed forces and all those Bangladeshi nationals who were loyal to the state during 1971 crisis.

Nevertheless Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina who follows pro-Indian policies, had also refused to attend D-8 conference in Islamabad in December, 2012 unless Pakistan tendered apology for the alleged genocide of Bengalis. Therefore, in connivance with the judiciary, she hurriedly executed Abdul Qadir Mullah-leader of Jamaat-e-Islami because of his loyalty to Pakistan.

The tragedy of dismemberment of East Pakistan was aimed at creating a compliant country through Indian trained and financed terrorists (Mukti Bahini) who had killed thousands of Pakistanis in cold blooded activities. In this connection, while addressing a ceremony during his Bangladesh tour, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi openly stated on June 7, 2015 that Indian forces helped Mukti Bahini to turn East Pakistan into Bangladesh. He elaborated that former prime minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had played an active role in separating Bangladesh from Pakistan, and he had also come to Delhi in 1971 to participate in the Satyagraha Movement, launched by Jana Sangh as a volunteer to garner support for the Mukti Bahini members.

Reviving old animosity, media of Bangladesh and India also started highlighting issue of 195 Pakistan Army officers allegedly involved in killing of Bengalis in 1971 war. Although they were repatriated to Pakistan after tripartite agreement between Pakistan, India and Bangladesh in 1974, yet Prime Minister Hasina Wajid intended to file cases against them at International Crime Tribunal (ICT).

While, a famous Bengali journalist Sarmila Bose authored a book, “Dead Reckoning: Memories of the 1971 Bangladesh War” after thorough investigation. Her book was published in 2011. While countering exaggerations of the Indian and Bengali Journalists, Bose argues that the number of Bengalis killed in 1971 was not three million, but around 50,000, while Bengalis were equally involved in the bloodshed of Punjabis, Biharis, Pashtoons and Balochis.

Majib was already in collusion with India for separation of East Pakistan. Therefore, when East Pakistan was occupied by Indian Army in 1971, he stated with pleasure that his 24 years old dream of an independent Bangladesh had been fulfilled.

By neglecting Islamabad’s positive approach, Bangladesh government has continued its anti-Pakistan approach to please India. It could be judged from the statement of Prime Minister Hasina Wajid who has vocally said, “Bangladesh has no room for the people loving Pakistan.”

For her second tenure, with the support of RAW, Prime Minister of Bangladesh and leader of the ruling party, Awami League, Sheikh Hasina Wajid won the general elections 2014 in wake of bloodshed due to her dictatorial steps. In this regard, head of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP), Begum Khaleda Zia who was leading the alliance of the opposition parties protested against the rigging, deliberately practised by the Awami League, was placed under virtual house arrest during the election-campaign. The country’s largest religious party, Jamaat-e-Islami was also banned from taking part in the elections.

However, Bangladesh’s ruling party, under Sheikh Hasina Wajid maintains an anti-Pakistan posture by keeping the Indian-backed “hate Pakistan” agenda alive, while, her government has failed to deliver the goods to the people.

Undoubtedly, Prime Minister Hasina Wajid acts, as if she is an Indian national. Her sole aim is to remain in power and New Delhi has assured her that she will never lose political power, if she follows a strong anti-Pakistan posture. While, Prime Minister Hasina has badly failed in providing good governance and relief to the poor and maintains her relevance in Bangladesh only by propagating against Pakistan and making the latter a scapegoat of her dirty politics.

Notably, Hasina Wajid is anti-Islam and hates her own country’s Muslim majority as much as she hates Pakistan. So, the people of Bangladesh will soon recognize her real face and she will again be rejected by her own people.

No doubt, a majority of Bengalis are against pro-Indian policy of the government of Bangladesh at the cost of Islamabad, the real perpetrator is New Delhi which desires to see a permanent rift between Islamabad and Dhaka.

Regarding false flag operations, it is also of particular attention that Indian RAW had arranged the Mumbai terror attacks of November 26, 2008 and assault of the Indian parliament of December 13, 2001, and without any enquiry, Indian high officials and media had started deliberate blame game against Islamabad by alleging that Mujahideen and the banned Lashkar-e-Tayba based in Pakistan and ISI were behind those terror events.

While, on July 19, 2013, the Indian former home ministry and ex-investigating officer Satish Verma disclosed that terror attacks in Mumbai in November 26, 2008 and assault on Indian Parliament in January 12, 2001 were carried out by the Indian government to strengthen anti-terrorism laws.

Similarly, on January 2, this year, Indian intelligence and security agencies had arranged the terror attack at Indian Air Force Base in Pathankot in order to implicate Pakistan’s ISI, linking this spy agency with some banned militant groups. Afterwards, this orchestrated drama was also exposed, as Indian police and other security agencies did not cooperate with Pakistan’s joint investigation team which visited India in this respect.

Nonetheless, as part of anti-Pakistan rhetoric, every time, these conspirators come up with new strategy to implicate Pakistan and its security agencies. In these terms, terror attack at Dhaka restaurant is another false flag operation, conducted by Indian RAW with the cooperation of intelligence agencies of Bangladesh so as to distort the image of Pakistan and ISI.  

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com


Saudi Arabia bombings: Real Planners of the Sunni-Shia Conflict?


                         
                                                       
By Sajjad Shaukat

Suicide bombers hit three cities of Saudi Arabia on July 4, this year and killed at least four people in the holy month of Ramadan, near the day of Eid al-Fitr. The first attack occurred near the US Consulate in Jeddah. One explosion rocked Qatif in eastern Saudi Arabia when a suicide bomber attempted to launch an assault at a Shia mosque. The other suicide bomber detonated a bomb near the security headquarters of the Prophet Muhammad’s Mosque in Medina, the second-holiest site in Islam.

The bombings in Saudi Arabia followed the recent terror attacks in Turkey, Bangladesh, Yemen and Iraq which killed scores of people, and the Islamic State group (Also known as ISIS, ISIL or Daesh) claimed responsibly for these assaults except those conducted in Turkey and Saudi Arabia which are also thought to be carried out by ISIS. Meanwhile, according to a latest report, a suicide bomber riding a motorbike attacked a police station in the Indonesian city of Solo on July 5, leaving one officer injured.  Indonesia is the majority Sunni nation, also having Shias.

In case of Bangladesh, assault on the Holey Artisan Bakery (Restaurant) in the diplomatic district of Dhaka, a least 20 hostages and two police officers were killed. It also includes nine Italians, seven Japanese and one American. Bangladesh’s 160 million people are almost all Sunni Muslims.

Western analysts opine that the “ISIS, now under pressure in its core territory of Iraq and Syria from where their militants are on flee owing to the successful military operations led by Russian-supported forces. The group has started missions elsewhere in the world.

However, triple blasts in Saudi Arabia cannot be seen in isolation, as these are part of the secret strategy of some state actors like US, Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and India. Their intelligence agencies, especially American CIA and Israeli Mossad and Indian RAW are in connivance with the ISIS militants to obtain the collective and individual interests against Russia, the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad, Pakistan and Iran. In these terms, false flag operations such as the terror attacks in Brussels and Paris, including Orlando shooting were part of the same scheme. In fact, there is a co- relationship of the double game and false flag operations.

It is notable that on June 28, 2016, The New York Times wrote, “The mass shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando, Fla., on June 12 included a curious phrase:  false flag…The victims in the shooting? They were “crisis actors” hired to promote the story as a pretext to impose tighter gun restrictions, the theory goes…the term false flag relates to naval warfare when a ship would fly a flag that would conceal its true identity as a way to lure an enemy closer. Today, it is commonly a shorthand for an act of deception…conspiracy theorists have applied the label to high-profile attacks, including the shootings by a husband and wife last year in San Bernardino, Calif, that killed 14…the phrase has even been used to doubt the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.”

In an interview with Brazilian TV on June 14, 2016, the ex-wife of the Orlando shooter Omar Mateen Sitora Yusufiy disclosed that American FBI pressurized her to keep quiet about his homosexuality. Since the attack, Mateen has been dubbed an Islamic terrorist by the politicians, senior officials and commentators in the US, following reports he had pledged allegiance to the Islamic State group, as they wanted to downplay the personal and self-hating nature of the assault.

Similarly, Bangladesh which has been entrapped by India left no stone unturned in implementing propaganda against Pakistan. As regards the terror assault on the Dhaka restaurant, Home Minister of Bangladesh Asaduzzaman Khan blamed homegrown Islamist terrorists and Pakistan’s intelligence agency ISI and added, “there is no IS or al-Qaeda presence in Bangladesh…the hostage-takers were all home-grown terrorists and not members of IS or any other international Islamist outfits.” This statement was opposite to the top officials of the country, who has claimed that ISIS exists in Bangladesh. However, availing the opportunity, Indian media also began a campaign, accusing ISI in this respect.

It is mentionable that on January 13, 2015, at least seven personnel of the Afghan security forces died during the suicide attack which targeted the Pakistani consulate in Jalalabad. The ISIL claimed responsibility for the terror assault which coincided with efforts to restart the suspended peace process with Taliban insurgents. Pakistani sources suggested that Indian secret agency RAW was behind this terror attack to thwart these peace talks. On May 21, 2016, the CIA-operated drone strike killed the Chief of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Akhtar Mansour in Nushki, Balochistan province of Pakistan. After the incident, Afghan Taliban leaders refused to participate in the US-sponsored talks with the Afghan government. Notably, in the recent past, with the help of Pakistan, a series of meetings were held in Islamabad and Kabul among the representatives of Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and the US to develop an understanding for the earliest possible resumption of stalled talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban with view to ending nearly 15 years of bloodshed in Afghanistan. This latest strike by the US predator in Balochistan gave a greater setback to peace process for Afghanistan under the Quadrilateral Coordination Group framework.

While, the US, China and Pakistan are jointly working to facilitate the process so as to bring peace both in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and the whole region. But, Washington is playing double game with Pakistan, because it is the only nuclear country in the Islamic World, which irritates America, India, Israel and some Western partners of the US. Hence, secret agents of CIA, Mossad and RAW which are well-penetrated in the ISIS, the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) are using the militants of these terrorist outfits to destabilize Tibetan regions of China, Iranian Sistan-Baluchistan, Pakistan’s province of Balochistan and Central Asia (Russian interests) by arranging the subversive activities to promote acrimonious sense of dissent, sectarian violence and to arouse sentiments of separatism. In this regard, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is their special target. Collectively or individually, these intelligence agencies are also assassinating, Jundullah (God’s soldiers)—the Sunni militant group which is active in Balochistan against Shias. Besides martyring several personnel of Pakistan’s security agencies in the province, these foreign-backed entities kidnapped and massacred many innocent people, including Chinese and Iranian nationals.  

It is of particular attention that the US had planned to spark a civil war between the Sunnis and Shias in wake of fake global war on terror to obtain the illegitimate interests of the Zionist Jews and Israel. For the purpose, a study of Rand Corporation, titled ‘US Strategy in the Muslim World After 9/11’ was conducted on behalf of the then US Deputy Chief of Staff for Air Force. Its report which was released on December 27, 2004 advocated that Sunni-Shia sectarian division should be exploited to promote the US objectives in the Muslim World. The report was first implemented in Iraq. CIA also got the services of Mossad to fuel sectarian violence in Iraq. In 2004, major terror-attacks were carried out against the Shias. Afterwards, a chain of Shia-Sunni clashes started between Iraqi Shias and Sunnis, targeting each other’s mosques and religious leaders through bomb blasts, suicide attacks etc. After Iraq’s experiment, more deadly pattern of sectarian strife and clashes was conducted in Pakistan.

While hinting towards US and Israel, Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei had revealed, “The bloody actions being committed in Iraq, Pakistan and Iran are aimed at creating a division between the Shias and Sunnis…those who carry out these terrorist actions are directly or indirectly foreign agents.”

Pakistan’s leading Ulemas (Religious scholars) of the Shia-Sunni sects, including politicians have repeatedly pointed out that external conspiracies were being hatched to destroy peace in the country though sectarian divide.

Meanwhile, rift between Saudi Arabia and Iran widened in the aftermath of the execution of the prominent Shia religious leader Nimr al-Nimr as part of Riyadh’s executions of 47 persons on terrorism charges, on January 2, this year. Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries like Qatar, Bahrain and Kuwait, including Sudan broke off diplomatic relations with Iran.

The long rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran came to a boiling point, as rulers and religious leaders of both the countries were accusing each other of promoting sectarian divide in the Islamic World on the Shia-Sunni basis, while manipulating Arab-non-Arab differences.

The debate accelerated in Pakistan regarding terrorism, sectarian divide, Saudi Arabia, ISIS etc. The opposition leaders like Imran Khan said that Pakistan should offer mediatory role in defusing the tension between Riyadh and Tehran. They pointed out that aligning with the Saudi-led counter terrorism alliance may spark sectarianism in the country and the region.

Besides, Pakistan’s media commentators openly remarked on the TV channels that ISIS was created by the US, and like America, Saudi Arabia wants to change the Syrian regime of Assad—also due to the reason that Syria is a Shia country. They also said that no Shia-country has been included in the so-called alliance of Saudi Arabia to fight ISIS. And as to why Islamabad does not join the Russian-led genuine coalition to fight the ISIS terrorists.

Particularly, a senior media analyst of Pakistan, Najam Sethi elaborated that Saudi Arabia have, in fact, decided to promote sectarian divide in the Muslim World.

When Pakistan’s opposition parties lashed out at the government in the National Assembly for not coming up with a clear stance on the situation, arising out because of the tension between Saudi Arabia and Iran and called for a parliamentary briefing on the issue so as to make efforts to prevent Sunni-Shia conflict in the region, Adviser to Pakistan’s Prime Minister on Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz stated before the National Assembly. “The Muslim World faces grave dangers in the situation…Pakistan will continue to play its positive role to ease tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia and it advocates unity among the Muslim countries.”

For the purpose, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Chief of Army Staff, General Raheel Sharif had visited Saudi Arabia and Iran. They held meetings with their rulers in a bid to defuse tensions between the two countries. They called for resolution of the crisis through peaceful means in the larger interest of the Muslim world. In this respect, Islamabad decided to appoint a focal person on Saudi-Iran issue.

Knowing the double game of the US-led some Gulf countries like Saudi Arabia, including Turkey which are assisting the Sunni-based militant outfit ISIS with money and weapons to oust the Shia-government of Syrian President Assad, and which also seem determined to promote Sunni-Shia conflict in the Muslim World, in the recent past, Islamabad refused to send its troops in Syria to fight against the ISIS. Similarly, last year, despite the insistence of Riyadh, Islamabad did not join the Saudi-led coalition which had been conducting air strikes on Yemen. Instead, Pakistan’s parliament had passed a unanimous resolution which stated, “The war in Yemen is not sectarian in nature, but has the potential of turning into a sectarian conflict which will have critical fallout in the region including Pakistan.” It urged the government “to stay neutral in the Yemen” conflict and called upon “warring factions in Yemen to resolve their differences peacefully through dialogue.”

On December 15, 2015, Saudi Arabia announced a 34-state Sunni-based military alliance to fight the ISIS. The alliance included Islamic states such as Egypt, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, Turkey, Malaysia, and some African states, with a joint operations centre established in Riyadh. The name of Pakistan was also mentioned in the list. Washington immediately welcomed the alliance. On December 17, 2015, Pakistan’s Foreign Secretary Aizaz Chaudhry stated that he was surprised to read the news that Saudi Arabia had named Pakistan as part of the alliance, without Islamabad’s permission.

It is worth-mentioning that Saudi rulers have been accusing Iran of fueling sectarianism and division in the Islamic World by backing Yemen, Syrian regime and Hezbollah. But, ground realities are quite opposite, as from the very beginning, Iran, Syria and Hezbollah which have always supported the right of self-determination of the Palestinians by condemning continued atrocities of Israel on them—have been showing solidarity with the PLO and Hamas which are Sunni groups.   

Confused due to his own double game and that of the US-led Israel, which Ankara also implements, while talking about the Istanbul Airport terror attacks of June 28, Turkish President President Recep Tayyip Erdogan stated on July 2, 2016 that President Assad was a more advanced terrorist than the Islamic State group, despite the deadly attack on Istanbul’s Ataturk Airport which Turkish officials blamed on ISIL. There is another contraction, as a Turkish official told the AP that the “three bombers who carried out the attack on Istanbul’s main airport had connections to Russia, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan,” having links with the ISIL.

Like Turkey, Saudi Arabian rulers who have already been funding the ISIS, Al-Qaeda’s Al-Nusra Front and the rebel groups in accordance with the directions of Israel and CIA have been fighting for survival of their kingship. Hence, they do not bother for division of the Islamic World on sectarian lines. In pursuance of the Israel-led American secret strategy, Saudi Arabia has chosen the path of leading unrest in the Middle East. But, Riyadh must know that more chaos in the Middle East will also envelop Saudi Arabia, culminating Saudi monarchy.  

Nevertheless, Saudi Arabia is being deeply respected by the Islamic countries, as it is the custodian of the two Holy Mosques. But, it is very shocking for all the Muslims that it has decided to promote sectarian divide in the Muslim World by manipulating the terror attacks in Saudi Arabia. Whenever suicide attack hit Saudi Arabia, Saudi rulers propagate that holy places of Mecca and Medina are under threat. The main aim behind is to get the sympathies of general masses of the Muslim countries against Shias, Iran, Syria and Russia which have exposed the US phony war in Syria and Turkish-Saudi support to ISIS. While Syrians, Yemenis and Iranians are also Muslims and respect the holy places of Saudi Arabia like the Sunni Muslims. But, they are against the Saudi-led Israeli policy.  

Undoubtedly, we can conclude that the US, Zionist Jews, Israel, India, Turkey and Saudi Arabia are the real planners who want to cause the Sunni-Shia conflict in the Islamic World in order to obtain their covert collective and individual interests.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic_pak@hotmail.com

Courtesy Veterans Today





India 'Stuck In 1962 War Mindset': Chinese Media On Nuke Club NSG Bid



Beijing, China
In China, the state-run media is continuing a sharply critical analysis of India's bid to enter the elite Nuclear Suppliers Group or NSG, which was thwarted by Beijing last month.

A state-run daily today said India is "still stuck in the 1962 war mindset" as it called for a more objective evaluation of Beijing's stand.

"The Indian public seems to be having a hard time accepting the outcome of the Seoul plenary meeting of Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) late last month after India failed to gain entry into NSG," an oped-page article in Global Times said.
The country seems to be "still stuck" in the shadow of the war with China in the 1960s and many still hold on to the "obsolete geopolitical view" that China does not want to see India's rise, it said.

"However, New Delhi may have misunderstood Beijing, which can make a big difference in its strategic decisions. In fact, China no longer looks at India simply from a political perspective, but far more from an economic one," the article said.

As New Delhi pushed its case to join the NSG last month, the Global Times, part of the publications of the ruling Communist Party of China publications, carried a number of articles including a hard-hitting editorial claiming that China's stand is "morally legitimate" and the West has "spoiled" India.

China has said that because India has not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the major global arms pact, it should not be allowed into the 48-nation bloc that controls the trade in nuclear technology and guards against a nuclear weapons race.

The US has lobbied heavily on India's behalf, arguing that Delhi's nuclear programme has been a responsible one, unlike that of Pakistan.

India better put more efforts into figuring out how to obtain international trust rather than misinterpreting and defaming China," said today's editorial, reflecting that other countries expressed similar misgivings about membership for India.

The NSG is expected to meet later this year for a likely discussion on India's membership, along with that of other countries who have not signed the non-proliferation treaty.

Covert Aims behind Illegal Drone Attacks


                                        
By Sajjad Shaukat

Under the pretext of American so-called counterinsurgency programme, and by implementing the anti-Muslim policy of his predecessor, the US President Barack Obama has broken all the record of human rights by extrajudicial killings of the innocent people through CIA-operated drone attacks in Afghanistan, Somalia, Yemen etc. in general and Pakistan in particular, while, the United States claims to be protector of human rights not only inside the country, but also all over the world.

On March 11, 2014, Ben Emmerson, UN Special Rapporteur on Counter-Terrorism and Human Rights, who conducted an investigation into targeted killings, and examined legality of drone strikes, presented his report on drone strikes to the UN Human Rights Council (HRC). His report examined 37 drone strikes as sample—the US, UK and Israel have launched in Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia and Gaza, which resulted into civilian casualties. Emmerson told the HRC, “These strikes require a legal duty on the relevant states to provide…a justification for the use of deadly force…to disclose the results of their own fact finding inquiries,why no such inquiries have taken place.”

Emmerson also referred to an interactive website, produced by Forensic Architecture team which marked the location of 30 drone strikes which helped in his final report.

In this context, Professor Eyal Weizman, the Principal Investigator of the Forensic Architecture project said, “Studying buildings hit by drones reveal much of consequences of a strike. The work we do is essential because states undertaking drone strikes, such as the US and Israel, attempt to hide actions and even deny them outright.”
However, CIA-operated illegal drone attacks in Pakistan cannot be seen in isolation, as these strikes are part of the US-led covert aims against this only nuclear country in the Islamic World.
May 21, 2016, the CIA-operated drone strike killed the Chief of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Akhtar Mansour in Nushki, Balochistan. After the incident, Afghan Taliban leaders refused to participate in the US-sponsored talks with the Afghan government. Notably, in the recent past, with the help of Pakistan, a series of meetings were held in Islamabad and Kabul among the representatives of Pakistan, Afghanistan, China and the US to develop an understanding for the earliest possible resumption of stalled talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban with view to ending nearly 15 years of bloodshed in Afghanistan. For the purpose, a number of the meetings were also held among Pakistan, America, China and Afghanistan. This latest strike by the US predator in Balochistan province gave a greater setback to peace process for Afghanistan under the Quadrilateral Coordination Group framework, which started in Murree with strenuous efforts of Islamabad.

On June 10, this year, a high-level delegation of the US visited Islamabad and met Pakistan’s Chief of the Army Staff Gen. Raheel Sharif and Adviser to the Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on Foreign Affairs Sartaj Aziz Adviser separately.

During the meeting, expressing his serious concern on the US drone attack in Balochistan as a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty, Chief of Army Staff, Gen. Raheel Sharif highlighted as to how it had impacted the mutual trust and was counterproductive in consolidating the gains of Operation Zarb-e-Azb. Gen. Raheel Sharif by elaborated, “All stakeholders need to understand Pakistan’s challenges…inter-tribal linkages and decades-old presence of over three million refugees…blaming Pakistan for instability in Afghanistan is unfortunate…target TTP [Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan] and its chief Mullah Fazlullah in their bases in Afghanistan—Indian RAW and NDS [Afghan National Directorate of Security] are fomenting terrorism in Pakistan which is committed to work for a long term peace process for Afghanistan under the Quadrilateral Coordination Group framework.”

On the one hand, Washington has demanded Pakistan’s support for dialogue with the Afghan Taliban, while targeted Taliban Chief Mullah Akhtar Mansour with drone, putting Islamabad in to a difficult position. In fact, these are part of American double game to destabilize Pakistan in order to obtain the secret goals of America, India and Israel.

The US has always preferred New Delhi over Islamabad. In this regard, during the recent visit of the Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi to America, addressing the media jointly, Prime Minister Modi said “I am thankful for the help and support that my friend Barack Obama has extended with regard to India’s membership of the Missile Technology Control Regime and Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG).”

America has been backing Indian hegemony in Asia to counterbalance China. During President Obama’s second visit to India, the US and India announced a breakthrough on a pact which would allow American companies to supply New Delhi with civilian nuclear technology, as agreed upon in 2008. This duplicity has initiated a dangerous arms race between Pakistan and India, and between China and India.  

Setting aside the Indian irresponsible record of non-proliferation, and safety of nuclear arms, Washington also pressurized the International Atomic Agency (IAEA) to sign an accord of specific safeguards with India. America had already contacted the NSG to grant a waiver to India for starting civil nuclear trade on larger scale.

Undoubtedly, unlike India, Pakistan’s nuclear assets are in safe hands—well-protected and are under tight security arrangements, having the best command and control system. However, taking cognizance of the US double standard, China and some responsible countries have decided to oppose in the meeting of the NSG to grant a waiver to India in this regard.

Indian desperation in Afghanistan is increasing in the backdrop of growing engagements of Islamabad, Kabul, Beijing and Washington. Therefore, by arranging terror-assaults in Pakistan and Afghanistan, New Delhi is also sabotaging the peace process between the Afghan officials and representatives of Tehreek-e-Taliban Afghanistan.

Based in Afghanistan, American CIA, Indian RAW and Israeli Mossad which are well-penetrated in the ISIS and the TTP are using the militants of these terrorist outfits to destabilize Tibetan regions of China, Iranian Sistan-Baluchistan and Pakistan’s province of Balochistan by arranging the subversive activities. In this connection, the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is their special target. Collectively or individually, these intelligence agencies are also assisting Jundullah (God’s soldiers)—the Sunni militant group which is active in Balochistan against Shias.

Based in the Afghan provinces of Kunar and Nuristan, Mullah Fazlullah, chief of the TTP is running a parallel government in Afghanistan. The militants of this group have their own legal system and own authority, exercising strict control.

It is notable that Pakistan’s Armed Forces broke the backbone of the militants through military operation Zarb-i-Azb—killing thousands of insurgents including foreign terrorists, while, primary intelligence agency ISI and other law-enforcing agencies captured several terrorists in various regions of Pakistan. Therefore, the aim of the drone strike is to thwart, the success of Pakistan, achieved against terrorists.
These strikes by the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) which started on Pakistan’s tribal areas during the Bush era in 2004, intensified under the Obama Administration.
 It is mentionable that in 2013, first time, a US Senator Lindsey Graham, a staunch supporter of the predator attacks, openly admitted that 4,700 people have been killed by the raids of America’s secretive drone war. The number exceeds some independent estimates of the death toll.

According to the research of London-based Bureau of Investigative Journalism, “Between June 2004 and September 2012, these unmanned aerial vehicles killed between 2,562 and 3,325 people in Pakistan, of whom between 474 and 881 were civilians including 176 children.” In this respect, in a report, The Guardian disclosed on August 11, 2011, “The CIA claims that there has been not one non-combatant killed in the past year…it is a bleak view: more people killed than previously thought.”

But, details collected by the Pakistani journalists show that civilian casualties through unmanned aircraft are higher as indicated by the US officials—more than 5000 innocent civilians and only 22 Al-Qaeda commanders have been killed by these aerial attacks.

In fact, American such a duplicity contains many other covert designs. America wants to provoke the tribal people against Pakistan’s security forces. The US drone campaign could give a setback to the democratic system in Pakistan. Its another aim is to create a rift between Pakistan’s armed forces and the elected government on one side and opposition parties including general masses on the other.

And the US seeks to incite the tribal people to join the militant outfits and to conduct terror attacks inside Pakistan. In this respect, a report of the New America Foundation revealed, “When the US drones attack Pakistan’s tribal areas, it is not just the 10, or 50 innocent civilians they kill, these killings provide reason to the youngsters for joining terrorist groups waging war against US and of course Pakistan…while killing 10 militants, the US has murdered more than 1400 Pakistanis, not involved in any terrorist activities. Could it not imply that it gave birth to another 1400 militants?”

Based on research, a report, “Living Under Drones,” prepared by experts from Stanford Law School and the New York University School of Law had revealed that the US campaign of drone “strikes in Pakistan’s northwestern tribal belt is terrorizing civilians 24 hours a day and breeding bitter anti-American sentiment…have killed thousands of people…even stopping their children going to school for fear of being targeted.” The report urged Washington to rethink its drone strategy, arguing it was counterproductive and undermined international law.

The New York Time on May 26, 2011, disclosed, “President Obama has become personally involved in the process” and “has normalized extrajudicial killings from the Oval Office, taking advantage of America’s temporary advantage in drone technology. Without the scrutiny of the legislature, Obama is authorizing murder on a weekly basis.”

While justifying these air strikes by the spy planes, counterterrorism advisor to Obama, John Brennan who had faced a Senate confirmation hearing for his nominee as CIA director is the main player, advising Obama on which strike, he should approve. Although he has defended attacks by the CIA-controlled unmanned planes by justifying their success in eliminating Al Qaeda militants, yet these strikes are proving counterproductive for Pakistan.

Nevertheless, setting aside the parliament resolution, rallies and processions of Pakistan’s political and religious parties, while ignoring the Pak-US rapprochement, and without bothering for any internal backlash, these aerial attacks have kept on going on the tribal regions.

Now, trust deficit has deepened between Pakistan and the US since May 21, 2016, when the CIA-operated drone strike killed the Chief of the Afghan Taliban Mullah Akhtar Mansour in Balochistan.

US ex-presidents, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have opposed Obama’s faulty drone strategy. Even, Secretary of State John Kerry has also criticized unabated use of unilateral drones in Pakistan, saying, “US engagement with the world is not just about drones.”

Apart from widespread criticism from some US allies and human rights groups which have remarked that these aerial attacks are illegal and unethical, and violation of the targeted countries’ sovereignty, the United Nations Charter, universal declaration of human rights and international law, the US warrior President Obama remains obstinate to continue extrajudicial killings through CIA-operated drones so as to fulfil the covert aims of the US-led countries.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com