Thursday, 28 April 2016

‘Someone’ Has Got Nothing to Do with Panama Papers




By:       Aasef Chauhdry

Whether somebody agrees or not but the fact remains that the Panama Papers leak has put Mian Nawaz Sharif on the back foot; as  the prime minister as well as an individual. It was beyond his farthest imagination that his family’s off-shore companies’ details would be revealed some day. Thanks to his aides and well-wishers and advisers who advised him only to land in further trouble. Then some real sincere suggested him to avoid the public’s demand and instead start touring the strongholds just to divert the attention from the opposition’s demand. Hence, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif decided to address people through public meetings for which he has already kicked off. The public contact campaign started from Kotli Sattiyan, Murree Hills two days back. During this political tour the development projects will also be inaugurated. It was followed by a rally in Mansehra today where he announced different projects also.

According to the analysts, the PM has decided to start the public contact campaign in the wake of increasing pressure from the opposition parties after the Panama leaks. In a related development, Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party head Mehmood Khan Achakzai called on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif at his office last week. According to reports, Panama leaks, formation of a judicial commission and other national issues came under discussion at the meeting. Although, Prime Minister Sharif announced in a televised address to the nation about writing a letter to the chief justice of Pakistan to constitute a judicial commission for an inquiry into the offshore companies owned by his family and the allegations of money laundering against his family members, however, the opposition has out rightly rejected the forming of any such commission, terming it as a total eye-wash and attention diverting tactics. The Opposition while rejecting the proposed commission alleged that they were not consulted on terms of reference of the commission.

As a PM Nawaz Sharif has a right to tour any part of the country that he is heading as a prime minster, however the timings and the contents of his speeches are raising a big question mark. The last time he visited Kotli Sattiyan was way back when he was Punjab’s chief minister and then during his earlier two tenure as the PM he never thought of visiting this place but now suddenly when there is a big hubbub about Panama Papers, he found it must to visit this forsaken place after 26 years. So would be the case with other places that he would be visiting and announcing projects and grants.

Those who know the PM well might view this latest assault into populism as not much more than an attempt to run interference in response to pressure from opposition parties which are currently champing at the bit in the hope of catching the prime minister or his family up to no good in the foreign property market, courtesy the Panama Papers and they are right to some extent. However, the prime minister playing it quite smartly called the public’s and opposition’s demand to answer the sources of wealth as the attempts of “destabilisation”.

During his address at Mansehra, Prime Minister Muhammad Nawaz Sharif vowed not to let ‘anyone’ sabotage the PML-N government’s agenda of people’s development, and warned his political opponents of the masses’ strong reaction. “I want to tell the leg pullers that if they will create hurdles in the way of Pakistan’s development, the masses will throw them out,” he said while addressing a large public gathering in Dhudhial. The Prime Minister asked his political opponents to fully ponder over before taking any steps, as the masses were not ready to tolerate any hurdle in the way of development. Now this was something worrisome because this was not the first time that he indirectly attacked his so-called unknown opponents. The print and electronic media has openly blamed Nawaz Sharif for alleging the army for what all is happening around him. So there is no mystery if one is seriously interested in identifying that ‘anyone’ or ‘someone’, who is haunting our worthy prime minister.

During both the public meetings, prime minister answered a set of rhetorical questions posed by himself as to the wonders performed by his government over the last three years and some of the crowd shouted “We love you Mr. Prime Minister”. Indeed they may, but when the road show has packed up and left town, mega projects are not going to camouflage the fact that there are hard questions to answer, and the opposition is in no mood to chew the cud in silence. The political analysts are fearing that Nawaz Sharif once again committing a mega blunder thus keeping his past tenures’ tradition up and alive by locking on horns with the establishment. Some are of the view that he is doing this deliberately and purposely while others consider it his ‘ego blunder’. Nevertheless, one thing is for sure that he will have to satisfy the nation about his off-shore companies and the money discreetly transferred abroad; an unpleasant task that he has to perform whether he likes it or not.

Wednesday, 27 April 2016

Blue Gold: The Probable Reason for Next Sub-continental Conflict?


The beauty of Indian propaganda is that whenever the Indian government is in a tight corner some nonissue is blown out of proportion and suddenly the issues disappear from the scene like everyone must have observed these days that there was a roar about the serving Indian naval officer’s apprehension by the Pakistani intelligence agencies and then there was a hullaballoo about water stealing by the Indians, nevertheless, suddenly all these sensitive issues are no more there. The Indian agencies, government and the media are whole heartedly spending their time and efforts on Mian Nawaz Sharif and his family’s cases. There is so  much to talk that it can’t be cover in just one write up but there is no harm in taking a less discussed topic and that’s the stealing water share of Pakistan by India.
Some connoisseurs believe the only recognized case of a “water war” happened about 4,500 years ago, when the city-states of Lagash and Umma went to war in the Tigris-Euphrates basin. However, Adel Darwish, a journalist and co-author of Water Wars: Coming Conflicts in the Middle East, says modern history has already seen at least two water wars and he quotes former Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon confessing on record that the reason for going to war [against Arab armies] in 1967 was for water,” Yet another example is of Senegal and Mauritania also, who fought a war starting in 1989 over grazing rights on the River Senegal. And then Syria and Iraq too, have fought minor skirmishes over the Euphrates River. Mark Twain gave a famous quote that “whisky is for drinking; water is for fighting over”.
No one would have ever given a serious thought to it but unfortunately a series of reports from intelligence agencies and research groups indicate the prospect of a water war is becoming increasingly probable. The seasoned and mature forecasters from the world over are showing lost sleep for wars of the future, those will be fought over blue gold, as thirsty people, opportunistic politicians and powerful corporations, battle for diminishing resources. Nevertheless, here in the Subcontinent, the Indians are least pushed about the hovering conflict clouds and rapidly building dam after the dam. Out of 13 dams or hydroelectric projects, under construction in Indian occupied Kashmir, seven are on River Chenab; one is on Jhelum and one on the Indus.
An Indian environmental scientist Sunita Narain, soon after receiving her 2005 Stockholm Water Prize Award from King Carl Gustaf  XVI of Sweden in Stockholm said, “I am not here as a pessimist saying that India is doomed and that water wars are going to happen, and we are going to destroy ourselves. I am saying very clearly that if India continues on this route, yes there will be water wars…and we will become more and more crippled in our growth,” When Sunita said that, “Water wars are not inevitable. It lies in our hands and in our minds…,” (to obviate them) it was not just to receive a cash award and a crystal sculpture. In fact she said that as an assiduous director of the Centre for Science and Environment in New Delhi and as the publisher of a highly praised environmental magazine Down to Earth. If some political experts hold the view that the world’s future wars will be fought over water and not over oil, they are not wrong in saying so.
The only difference is that while most of the nations will fight to get water, some ill-fated nation like ours will continue to fight not to have water, as is being done these days. Deforestation in hilly areas, the urbanisation of flood plains, the sea level rise due to global warming, increased melting of snow and exceptional rainfall, are not phenomena exclusive to one or the other region. Rather, these are problems faced globally by every country. Water is the sole reason for which almost over 10,000 dams have or are being constructed in the US, and over 300 water storage facilities are being constructed in India and China.
The need to provide food and water has not been relegated to the back burner elsewhere; hence new dams are being planned and constructed throughout Asia. There are presently about 99 dams under construction in China, 100 in Turkey, 81 in Korea, 25 in Iran and around 292 in India. Nearly 3200 major / medium dams and barrages had been constructed in India by the year 2012. As compared to that only 9 dams and that too disputed one, have been planned by Pakistan. Imagine the political instability in these countries if there was half as much disinformation against these dams as is the case against the Kalabagh Dam (KBD). Do we still need to find out what makes all these other dams feasible while ours is a disaster?
The tumult and uproar of those so-called nationalist parties, that don’t even have proper district representation, is totally baseless and purely meant to grab attention. Their sightless efforts are geared towards opposing the KBD at any cost, come what may. There is a famous Pashto saying — and who knows it better than Asfand Yar Wali, the self-acclaimed champions of Pashtun rights — ‘You cannot have a head without a headache.’ When a dam is being built there will always be some drawbacks and negative fallouts. But these are not restricted to KBD only.
The opposition has deliberately refrained from evolving a consensus. Not a single political leader has picked up the courage to come forward and drive some sense into the minds of others except for Imran, who has been dragged into another kind of nuisance.  When they are invited to the table to talk, they refuse to sit across and listen to others’ points of view. If they have some valid trepidations about the flooding of the Peshawar valley or Nowshera town or the adverse effects on Mardan’s SCARP, and dislocation of a large number of people, they should shun prejudices and listen to others’ assessments as well. I am certain that the nation’s water experts have a solution for their ‘headaches’.
Ironically this handful of nationalists appears to have exactly the same objectives as the Indians. In April 1948, India diverted the flow of the Ravi, Sutlej and Beas rivers, an act that threatened to destroy irrigated cultivation in Pakistan. Today, why divert, rivers allocated to Pakistan under the subsequent water accords and construct dams like Baglihar on them unless the intention is equally malafide? It is very unfortunate that all the main opposition parties who claim a national stature seem to have been hijacked by a handful of misguided people. Another tragedy is that the Punjab is irrationally being dragged into the controversy. The moot question is why those who can unite for any specious cause cannot unite for their motherland? It is high time that everyone teams up for this national project and militates against the jingoistic and intolerant attitudes.


Ashraf Ghani: Now and Then



By:      Aasef Chauhdry\

It was probably the third week of February 2015 when publically Afghan President Ashraf Ghani saluted Pakistan’s cooperation while Kabul was expecting former to lay the groundwork for peace with Taliban insurgents. His words were, “Afghanistan “appreciates Pakistan’s recent efforts in paving the ground for peace and reconciliation and we welcome the recent position Pakistan has taken in pronouncing Afghanistan’s enemy as Pakistan’s.” he in fact went a little further and cited two major attacks those helped to bring the countries closer together — one in Yahya Khel in Afghanistan in November 2014 that left nearly 50 people dead, and the TTP massacre at the Army Public School in Peshawar in December 2014 that killed 153, mostly children. Just before that Pakistani Interior minister said that relations between the two countries had never been better. He further said, “I think Afghanistan and Pakistan, working in close hands and in close cooperation, it will do wonders for cooperation in the field of counterterrorism”.
Mr. Ghani, who pledged to make peace talks a priority, as well as supportive signals from Pakistan, which has long held significant influence with the Taliban, have however boosted hopes for possible dialogue. He made a historic statement when said, “There are obviously elements opposing the peace process by spreading false information to cause public confusion and anxiety”. May be he didn’t knew then that what consequence this statement will have in future.
In April 2015, during his visit to India while answering Indian journalist Suhasni Haidar’s question in a interview Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani referring to the possibility of India being included in, or be a beneficiary of the Afghanistan Pakistan Transit and Trade Agreement (APTTA), he said that Regional cooperation requires a legal free-flow of goods and people. We are not asking Pakistan for any exceptional treatment. We are asking Pakistan for “national treatment”. Pakistani trucks come all the way to Attari. Why should Afghan trucks stop at Wagah? It’s a major cost for that distance, to load, unload and re-load. It is an incredible imposition on the cost of business. Sovereign states deal with sovereign equality. If we are not given equal transit access, then we will not provide equal transit access to Central Asia and we are clear. In our talks with the Commerce Minister of Pakistan (Khurram Dastgir) we have made it clear that it needs to be reciprocal. Relations between countries, especially when it comes to business, if there were significant reasons, if we had not accorded national treatment to Pakistani trucks, then we could have understood. This was the first visible change in the Afghan President.
It looks as if the Indian miscreants were on the job and succeeded in doing what they desperately wanted. In June 2015 the desperate and frustrated Ashraf Ghani once again demanded tough action from Pakistan against Taliban militants in a letter seeking greater anti-terrorism cooperation, after facing strong public criticism over a controversial intelligence-sharing deal between the neighbours. Although the spy agencies of both countries in June 2015 agreed to trade intelligence and bolster cooperation in their fight against the Taliban, the latest sign of a thaw in once-frosty ties, however, Ashraf Ghani didn’t look contended and wanted more to do. There is no denying that Pakistan had launched operation against terrorists of all hues and shades including remnants of Haqqani network, but with mounting terror attacks in Afghanistan, Ashraf Ghani was being criticized by members of both side of the divide for having concluded intelligence-sharing agreement with Pakistan.
The Afghan government’s anger at Pakistan over the Taliban spring offensive was hyperbolic — the Afghan National Security Forces have had years to prepare for this first summer of fighting where instead of foreign troops they were front and centre. By making the spring offensive, an issue, the opponents of deal were trying to instigate Afghan side to demand Pakistan to take action against terrorists. The distracters of the deal were trying to misguide Afghan leadership that Pakistan was again playing on both sides but the fact was that situation was quite contrary, Chief of Army Staff Raheel Sharif was quite committed to take action against terrorists of all hues and colors and very much keen to have cordial ties with neighboring country. President Ashraf Ghani had of course taken steps to soothe Pakistani concerns about Indian influence in Afghanistan. Relegating India to the periphery of his foreign policy, he had sent a group of army cadets to an academy in Pakistan as opposed to India, where Afghan soldiers are normally trained, and suspended a request for Indian weapons. Hence, Ashraf Ghani was not expected to hear the distracters.
However, in March this year seeing the changing mood of the afghan government, mainly played and commanded by pro Indian Abdullah Abdullah, the Afghan Taliban also expressed their displeasure and said that they would not take part in peace talks brokered by a four-way group including representatives of Afghanistan, Pakistan, China and the United States. Following a meeting of the Quadrilateral Coordination Group made up of representatives of the four countries in Kabul in February, officials said they expected direct peace talks between the Afghan government and the Taliban to begin in early March. But the Taliban publicly denied they would be participating in any upcoming talks in Islamabad. With the American troops remaining in the country conducting air strikes and special operations raids in support of the Kabul government, the Taliban would not participate in talks, the group said in a statement. Islamic Emirate once again reiterated that unless the occupation of Afghanistan is ended, blacklists eliminated and innocent prisoners freed, such futile misleading negotiations will not bear any results. On the other hand, direct talks between Kabul and the Taliban have been on hold since last year’s announcement of the death of the movement’s founder and long-time leader Mullah Omar some two years earlier. New leader Mullah Akhtar Mansoor has laid down preconditions for taking part in any talks as he struggles to overcome factional infighting, with some breakaway groups opposing any negotiations whatsoever.
And finally the day came when the Afghan President, while addressing a joint session of the Afghan parliament, very bluntly made a shift in his previous pro Pakistan stance and on April 25, 2016 said that Kabul will no longer seek Pakistan’s role in the ongoing peace talks with Taliban. The lame and repeated excuse he rendered was that, “Pakistan had promised to aid peace talks but we no longer expect Islamabad to bring Afghan Taliban to the negotiating table”. The Afghan president’s rare address to the joint session was aired live on state and private TV channels.
When asked for handing over the TTP’s trouble makers in Afghanistan the Afghan President would avoid answering such requests but at the same time very openly demands, “We want Pakistan to honour its commitment and take military action against the Afghan Taliban. We want them to handover the Taliban to the Afghan government so we can try them in Shariah courts”.  He described the Taliban as ‘ignorant’. Ghani’s comments came as the relationship between the two neighbouring countries deteriorates once again following a deadly attack on Afghan security agency headquarters in Kabul on April 19 which is strongly expected to be planned and carried out by the Indian RAW elements. Meanwhile, expressing anger at Ghani’s remarks Taliban described Afghan rulers as “slaves” and said they have been “imposed by John Kerry” on the Afghan people. “The rulers should face the fate like Dr Najeeb,” Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid said while referring to public hanging of the Communist leader in 1996.
Apparently the Indians have succeeded in creating misunderstanding among two great neighbours, however it won’t last long since at the end of the day the Afghan government would need someone whom the Afghan Taliban listen and that someone is certainly not India. It’s high time for Ashraf Ghani to understand it earliest possible.



Islamic State could steal Pakistan's nuclear weapons and make 'dirty bomb',



The mounting concern of an Islamic State presence in Pakistan has put the spotlight on the security of the country's nuclear arsenal. In February, the director-general of Pakistan's intelligence bureau, Aftab Sultan, said hundreds of fighters from his country were joining IS in Syria, generating concerns about their links and activities when they returned home.
He also said an undisclosed network in Pakistan had been broken up.
More recently, US President Barack Obama declared at a nuclear summit in Washington: "The threat from terrorists trying to launch a nuclear attack is real. It would change the world."
The warnings have triggered debate in Pakistan about the possibility of a "dirty" nuclear bomb.
"There is a possibility of making a dirty bomb if the militants abduct some nuclear scientists, metallurgists with some fissile materials and uranium from Iraq and Syria," said retired Brigadier Said Nazir.
The brigadier, now a defence analyst, spent much of his career in Pakistan's Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), bordering Afghanistan.
The FATA are home to 60 militant organisations, some sympathetic to IS, according to Mr Sultan.
Zia Ur Rahman Zia, an international politics professor at Qurtaba University in Peshawar, said he believed IS could make a dirty bomb.
"They have safe havens in Iraq and Syria where it can set up a laboratory to satisfy its nasty plans," he said.
"Pakistan's nuclear weapons might be secure but not safe.
"An ever growing danger persists of the militants putting their hands on the country's nuclear arsenals."
Professor Zia pointed to the attacks in recent years on the army's general headquarters in Rawalpindi and airbases in Mehran, Karachi, Kamra and Peshawar.
"These are not a soft target, keeping in view the track record of militant attacks on the highly secured installations in Pakistan, one can gauge the threat," he said.

Nuclear terror attack 'not possible': analyst

However, according to now retired Lieutenant General Talat Masood, a defence analyst in Islamabad, a terrorist-instigated attack is "technically not possible".
"The nuclear warheads, the safety mechanism and the electronic code words all lie in different hands. How could the militants therefore know how to trigger [a device]?" General Masood asked.
As further evidence of the security of the current arsenal, retired army officer and now social sciences dean at the National University of Science and Technology, Tughral Yameen, pointed to Pakistan's track record.
"Compared to 2000 incidents of leakages around the world, Pakistan has never witnessed a single incident of its nuclear weapons or fissile materials being stolen," Mr Yameen said.
"It's launching techniques are very complicated and hard to be triggered, at least by those with no know-how."

Pakistan's history of nuclear weapons

After Pakistan's defeat in the 1971 war against India, Islamabad formally initiated its nuclear program the following year and now has around 120 warheads.
Pakistan's nuclear security was dealt a devastating blow over a decade ago with the admission by Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of the Pakistani bomb, that he had secretly provided Iran, North Korea and Libya with the technical ability to develop nuclear weapons.
Pakistan's military has long been accused of links with terrorist groups and allowing the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan, which neighbours its lawless and porous FATA.
But some experts dismiss IS as having no viable command and control structure in Pakistan, or Afghanistan.
"How many militants are we talking of [on the ground]. On the other hand we are talking of over 700,000 professionals in the army, well trained and well equipped," said Brigadier Mehmood Shah, a former Secretary of Security for FATA.


Pakistan returns Kirpal Singh's body to family; doctors say organs missing

The body of Indian prisoner Kirpal Singh, who died under suspicious circumstances in a Lahore jail last week, arrived in India on Tuesday. His family members alleged that his body bore injury marks and foul play led to his death, but doctors who conducted an autopsy denied this.
Alleging foul play in his death, Kirpal's family members said the body bore injury and blood marks.
Contrary to the claims, the medical board which conducted the post-mortem examination here after his body was brought back to India on Tuesday, said there were no external or internal injury marks on the body.
Ashok Sharma, head of the three-member medical board, however, told the media after the post-mortem examination that the cause of death has not been established yet.
A family member holds up Kirpal Singh's photograph. AFP
The doctor said some organs from his body were missing, as an autopsy has already been done (in Pakistan).
"In the post-mortem examination, it was found that there was no external or internal injury on the body. Post-mortem of this body has already been done (in Pakistan) because stitches were present on the body and the head.
"When we opened the body, we found that some of the organs were missing because when post-mortem is done, some organs are taken to test to find out whether there is any disease or not," Sharma said.
"... rest of the organs which were present, we took out portions of those organs and we sent them for testing (to know) about diseases as well as poisoning. I can say with 100 percent accuracy that the wound marks which are inflicted during life, they cannot be removed. The cause of death has not been established yet," the doctor added.
After being handed over to the Border Security Force at the Attari-Wagah joint check post, Kirpal's body was immediately taken for post-mortem examination in Amritsar after which it was taken to Gurdaspur district for cremation in his native village.
His family members alleged that he was murdered either by fellow prisoners or prison officials in Pakistan.
Close relatives and residents from Kirpal Singh's village were present at Attari, 30 km from here, when the body was brought back to India.
The body, in a coffin, was carried by porters on the Indian side even as family members showered flowers on the coffin.
Close family members were allowed to see the body to identify Kirpal Singh's mortal remains.
Pakistani authorities have attributed his death to heart attack, but his family has alleged he was murdered in prison.
"He has been murdered by the Pakistanis under a conspiracy. He was the sole witness to the murder of Sarabjit Singh in the Lahore prison. We want a thorough inquiry and post-mortem to know the truth of his death," Kirpal's nephew told the media outside the hospital mortuary.
Kirpal Singh, the family has maintained, had inadvertently crossed into Pakistan and was arrested and charged with spying by Pakistani authorities.
His family had met union home minister Rajnath Singh and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal in New Delhi last week to seek immediate repatriation of his body to India.
The Punjab government has offered to extend all help and relief to Kirpal's family on the same lines as given to another Indian prisoner, Sarabjit Singh, who was murdered in the same prison in Lahore in April 2013.
Kirpal Singh, a former serviceman, was lodged in Lahore's Kot Lakhpat prison since 1992. He died on April 11.
Pakistani authorities had labelled him a spy and got him convicted for terror attacks inside Pakistan. He was initially sentenced to death which was later converted to 20 years' imprisonment.

 



Friday, 22 April 2016

Another Commendable Move by General Raheel


Sarah Khan
Amidst the hue and cry over Panama leaks which categorically named Sharif family in colossal corruption cases including evasion of taxes, General Raheel Sharif has dismissed 12 Army officers including a Lieutenant General and some commissioned and junior commissioned officers. The move is being hailed as first step towards accountability and bringing to justice the corrupts and looters. The development comes two days after the COAS said "across the board accountability is necessary for the solidarity, integrity and prosperity of Pakistan", adding that the war against terror cannot be won unless "the menace of corruption is uprooted".
Pakistan has always scored higher ranks in international indexes on corruption due to deep rooted corruption in our society. One may wonder why politicians of other political parties have not raised their voices against corruption charges of Sharif family. It is because almost all politicians of Pakistan are somehow or the other part of same corruption in which family of our Prime Minister has been named. General Raheel Sharif has only been able to take action against his fellow officers because his character remains impeccable and immaculate. Only a person with immaculate record can punish a guilty man.
General Raheel Sharif is 15th Chief of Army Staff (COAS) of the Pakistan Army appointed as a COAS on 29 November 2013. Since appointment as Chief of Army Staff, General Raheel Sharif has taken many bold and unprecedented steps which are becoming promising factors of Pakistan’s prosperity and development in the coming times. But his recent and unprecedented move of dismissing 12 army officers including a three star general will not only writ his name in history but he will be remembered as a national hero of the country.
On the account of counter terror efforts, the launch of Operation Zarb e Azb in June 2014 has achieved tremendous success in elimination of terrorists and their hideouts in North Waziristan. The year 2015 saw a tremendous decline in terrorist incidents in Pakistan which were exceptionally high and were growing since 2007. After tragic incident of APS massacre in December 2014 Army Chief played a vital role to arrest the terrorists responsible for  APS attack. Soon after the attack, he visited Afghanistan immediately and met with Afghan President and US military officials to ask for cooperation in arresting the responsible persons of this brutality. After lifting of ban on death penalty, he ensured hanging of all terrorists and their facilitators who had played a role in APS massacre. After terror incident at Lahore park, he launched military action against militant hideouts inside Punjab and categorically made it clear that action will be taken against all terrorists without any discrimination.
On foreign policy front, which remains a big failure due to ineligible bureaucrats, General Raheel Sharif has taken several initiatives to enhance ties with Russia and UK. The great project of The China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has unconditional support of Pakistan Army. On instructions of General Raheel in Baluchistan, FWO (Frontier Works Organization) has completed 502KM road in one and half year and its Engineers are helping provincial government for fast development. On Afghanistan front, General Raheel is playing a key role in reconciliation and peace talks among Taliban and Afghanistan government though this faces immense opposition from Indian lobby in Afghanistan.
His other remarkable steps include actions against militant wings of key political parties in Karachi, maintaining a balanced approach towards Iran-KSA in their rivalry over Yemen and Syrian crisis, announcing timely retirement on the pretext of building strong institutions and maintaining national interest a top priority. In addition to this, he played a very positive role during PTI-PML(N) clash over election rigging. Despite calls for military takeover from various quarters, General Raheel played the role of mediator among the two political parties, thus setting an example for upcoming military generals by avoiding military takeover. By doing so he not only regained lost confident of nation in military but also strengthened the democratic norms in the country.
In 2013, when General Raheel was appointed as COAS, Pakistan was going through extreme crises both internally and externally. Most of international reports had termed Pakistan as ‘most dangerous country’ in the World. But after assuming the command of prestigious Armed Forces of Pakistan, General Raheel took so many commendable steps which have ensured a bright and prosperous future of Pakistan. Since 2013, the overall image of Pakistan Armed Forces has been improved nationally and internationally and our Armed Forces have regained the lost image and fame after successfully clearing FATA from militants. Foregoing in view, the politicians and civil bureaucracy of Pakistan must also think in the same direction. After all it’s the civilian politicians of the Pakistan who owes a responsibility to ensure a peaceful and prosperous Pakistan with a modern and effectively capable Army to counter external threats to Pakistan from eastern or western fronts.     






Monday, 18 April 2016

The Indo-US alliance


By MUNIR AKRAM 

RECENTLY, US Defence Secretary Ashton Carter reportedly opened a meeting with senior Pakistani military leaders by declaring: “I must tell you, I am a friend of India.”
The statement, besides being gauche, was superfluous. Carter’s closeness to the Indians is all too evident. The US defence secretary has met four times in the last year with his Indian counterpart, as noted in the joint communiqué issued after his recent visit to India.
The joint communiqué outlines the vast scope and depth of the present and planned Indo-US military relationship; including co-production of advanced defence articles, joint research on advanced jet engines and aircraft carrier technologies, and strategic cooperation on maritime security.
Most significantly, India endorsed the US stand on the South China Sea islands dispute with China by reaffirming “importance of freedom of navigation and over-flight throughout the region, including in the South China Sea” and vowed support for “a regional security architecture”.
The US alliance with India has obvious and significant negative implications for Pakistan’s security.
The US has opened all military and technology doors to India, and encouraged Israel and other allies to do so as well. For the past eight years, India has been the world’s largest arms importer, buying over $100 billion in weapons each year, two-thirds of which are deployed against Pakistan. Moreover, US military and political support encourages India in its bellicose behaviour towards Pakistan.
It is not merely that Pakistan suffers ‘collateral damage’ from the US arming of India against China. The US has imposed — formally and informally — severe and discriminatory restraints on Pakistan’s acquisition of advanced and dual-use technologies and weapons systems from the US or allied sources.
It opposes Pakistan’s defensive responses to India’s build-up: fissile material production, theatre nuclear weapons and long-range missiles. Pressure has even been exerted on China not to transfer advanced weaponry and technologies to Pakistan. Unless this dynamic is changed, Pakistan’s capabilities for conventional defence and nuclear deterrence against India could be significantly eroded.
The latest confirmation of the Indo-US alliance comes at a time when Pakistan’s limited convergence with the US on Afghanistan may be fading. According to Indian press reports, Ashton Carter conveyed to the Indians that the US has given up on Pakistan’s cooperation to stabilise Afghanistan, and wants India to play a larger role there.

The US alliance with India has negative implications for Pakistan’s security.


Worse, the US appears to be encouraging closer ties between India and the GCC states, especially Saudi Arabia, which Modi’s visited recently. There may be an Iranian gambit as well. Given India’s close relations with Iran and informal US-Iranian cooperation against the militant Islamic State group in Iraq and Syria, collaboration between the US, India and Iran to ‘stabilise’ Afghanistan cannot be ruled out.
Pakistan must formulate a well-considered and calibrated military and diplomatic response to these adverse developments. Capitulation is not an option. India’s treatment of Nepal, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh should be a lesson against acceptance of Indian hegemony.
Pakistan’s military response will have to be defensive, asymmetrical, and designed to preserve the ability to deter and repel a conventional Indian attack, and the credibility of nuclear deterrence.
To break up a large Indian surprise attack (projected by the Cold Start doctrine), Pakistan can multiply its short-range, conventional missile capabilities. Air defence can also be best assured by anti-aircraft and ballistic missile defence systems. On the sea, Pakistan cannot afford expensive aircraft carriers; its defence will have to rely on submarines, large numbers of fast missile boats, and anti-submarine warfare capabilities.
To maintain credible nuclear deterrence and dissuade a pre-emptive enemy strike, Pakistan needs to continue to multiply its short, medium and long-range missile capabilities. Ultimately, the deployment of nuclear submarine-based missiles offers the most credible second strike option.
And, so long as India persists in its reported support for the Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan, and the Balochi Liberation Army, Pakistan would be unwise to give up the option of supporting the legitimate struggle of the Kashmiri people for freedom and self-determination.
Pakistan’s diplomacy will have to be dynamic and imaginative.
Strategic cooperation with China will remain critical. Just as the US is willing to share cutting-edge military technologies with India, China should be expected to share its most advanced weapons systems with Pakistan, including nuclear submarines, stealth aircraft, and its anti-aircraft carrier missiles.
Pakistan also needs to do much more to enhance military and diplomatic cooperation with Russia, which is locked in a new Cold War with the US, displeased with India’s embrace of America, and much closer to China. Several Russian weapons systems — the S300 anti-ballistic missile and the SU-31 fighter-bomber — are among the best in class.
In Afghanistan, Pakistan should clearly draw its ‘red lines’: no Indian military presence or use of Afghan territory for subversion against Pakistan. While continuing to support inter-Afghan dialogue, Islamabad should be prepared for a collapse in Kabul and prolonged Afghan chaos. Fostering an understanding with Iran is essential. Pakistan and Iran can cooperatively normalise their respective parts of Baluchistan and stabilise Afghanistan — unless Iran decides to align itself with India.
Rebuilding a close relationship with Saudi Arabia will restrain Indian penetration in the Gulf. This requires full support to the House Of Saud; it does not require participation in hostile operations against Iran.
Pakistan should continue its diplomatic engagement with the US, although there may be rough times ahead in the relationship.
The Sino-US rivalry is likely to get worse in the near future, given the angry and ugly mood in America, and rising nationalist sentiment in China. Eventually, once China acquires comparable military power, and large parts of Eurasia are incorporated into China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ economic community, Washington may come to accept coexistence and cooperation with the new superpower.
It may also come to recognise that Pakistan is a critical country whose cooperation is vital to ensure regional stability in south and west Asia, to prevent nuclear non-proliferation, and to and defeat global terrorism. Perhaps then, Washington will respect Pakistan’s legitimate security concerns.
The writer is a former Pakistan ambassador to the UN.
Published in Dawn, April 17th, 2016


Thursday, 14 April 2016

General (retd) Zaheerul Islam: The shadow warrior



Illustration by Aan Abbas

There were rumours in the air. During the 126-day-long dharna by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) against the ruling Pakistan Muslim League–Nawaz (PMLN), there were murmurs of a coup d’état. Other than General Shuja Pasha, the former intelligence officer who is known to be a close friend and supporter of PTI Chairman Imran Khan, the other name that was repeatedly brought up was that of Zaheerul Islam, the then director general of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). Allegedly, the two were conspiring to create a rift between Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Chief of Army Staff General Raheel Sharif. In the past, the premier had acted against generals whom he had differences with. It was expected that he would again act in a similar manner, under the presumption that the dharna had the general’s backing. But the events did not play out as expected. Not exactly.
It was Federal Defence Minister Khawaja Asif who first stated that the two were behind the political unrest that prevailed last year. Specifically, the minister said, Islam had a “personal grievance” with the ruling party for siding with a particular media house. Asif was subsequently sidelined and snubbed at a dinner with army generals and quickly made to learn a central lesson.
Not everyone took from his experience. In an interview with the BBC in August 2015, Senator Mushahidullah Khan claimed that an audio tape obtained by the Intelligence Bureau was played during a meeting between Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Raheel Sharif last year, in which Islam could be heard giving instructions to raid the prime minister’s office. According to the senator, when questioned by General Raheel Sharif, Islam confirmed that the voice was his own.
Khan later clarified that he himself had not heard the tape. Never mind the fact that he kept referring to the ex-ISI Chief as Zahirul Islam Abbasi – the major general who had plotted to overthrow the Benazir Bhutto government in 1995, and who died six years ago – the damage had been done.
Appointed on the recommendation of then President Asif Ali Zardari in March 2012, Islam became the 18th director general of the ISI. He has remained mostly out of the spotlight and yet, he manages to cast a shadow over many major events in the last few years. The most significant of them was when a private television channel ran photographs of Islam alongside allegations by journalist Hamid Mir’s brother stating that firing on the prime-time anchorperson was the handiwork of the intelligence agencies.
Islam has a strong military background; his father, brothers and brother-in-law had also served in the army. His uncle, Shah Nawaz, was a major general in the Indian National Army, led by Subhas Chandra Bose, and was captured and detained by the British briefly in the early 1940s.
Islam belonged to the Punjab Regiment, he was in charge of a division in Murree before being promoted to lieutenant general and being posted as Corps Commander Karachi. 
He was mentioned in Forbes magazine’s most powerful people list as the “new head of Pakistan’s notorious intelligence service” in 2012. “The ISI has played both sides in the war on terror and, as US troops draw out of Afghanistan, will be hugely influential in determining the region’s future,” the magazine went on to state. He succeeded Pasha, who had had the embarrassing distinction of being the ISI chief when Osama bin Laden was killed by US forces in Abbottabad.
With the reputation of being an ‘honest’ officer and a close aide of General Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, it was expected that Islam would continue Kayani’s policy of minimal interference in political matters. That seems to not have happened. And as recent events suggest, he may have been out of office but still holds a lot of say on the political development — albeit by default and alleged association. Quite like most of his career in the intelligence, he has refused to come out of the shadows to clarify his position. Or shall we wait until the Official Secrets Act no longer applies to him?


Fact-Finding: Pathankot and Doval

By Sajjad Shaukat

Being a peace-loving country, Pakistan is determined to promote peace in its neighborhood and the entire region in particular and the whole world in general. Hence, bilateralism and non- interference have been the key components of Pakistan’s foreign policy initiatives.

Regrettably, India which has never accepted the reality of partition of the Sub-continent has always been sponsoring terrorism in Pakistan through its proxies. Now, to realize the 1971 experience, Indian government has tasked its secret agency, RAW to support terrorist activities in Pakistan’s province of Balochistan as part of India’s offensive-defensive doctrine whose real architect is Ajit Doval, the ex-spymaster who is now National Security Advisor of Indian Prime Minister Modi and is also controller of Indian internal and external policies.

With the tactical backing of CIA and Mossad, RAW has also been supporting the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA)  and other separatist outfits and Jundollah (God’s soldiers) which have committed various subversive acts in Balochistan—abductions and killings of several nationals of China and Iran. These agencies are also weakening Pakistan, because it is the only nuclear country in the Islamic World.

Therefore, Pakistan has become hub of cross frontier proxies and Indian role has become naked after the arrest of Kulbhushan Yadav, on March 24, 2016. Yadav openly admitted that he was the serving agent of Indian RAW in Balochistan, and during his stay, he contacted various Baloch separatist leaders and insurgents, including Dr Allah Nazar Baloch, to execute the task to damage the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor project (CPEC).

In this regard, while addressing a joint press conference with Federal Minister for Information Pervaiz Rasheed, Director General of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Lt. Gen. Asim Saleem Bajwa disclosed on March 29, 2016 that Yadav was an active officer of the Indian Navy prior to his joining RAW. He also served as a scrap dealer and had a jewelry business in Chahbahar, Iran, after he joined RAW in 2013.

In a video, during the press conference, Yadav confessed that he spied for India and was assigned with the task to create unrest in Karachi and Balolchitan—to destabilise Pakistan and to target the Gwadar Port. Yadav also disclosed that he was funding Baloch separatists along with other terrorists—he was captured, while heading Iran.

However, different instances of Indian involvement in Pakistan like support to Mukti Bahini terrorists in creation of Bangladesh, exploitation of sub-nationalists in Balochistan and Sindh, links with sectarian extremists groups including Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) etc. to create unrest in the tribal areas and in the whole country are part of the offensive-defensive of Ajeet Doval.

In this context, RAW with the assistance of some external entities, particularly Israeli Mossad have well-established its espionage network in Afghanistan, and besides backing other similar terrorist groups, it has been assisting Afghanistan-based TTP which has claimed responsibility for several terror attacks inside Pakistan, including the recent one at Gulshan-e-Iqbal Park (Children Park) in Lahore on Easter Sunday (March 27, 2016), which killed at least 72 persons, including 29 children.

It is notable that Islamabad condemns terrorism of all sorts and is committed to stand by its international commitments. Security policy of the country, supported by all stake holders including the government and security institutions aims at eradicating terrorists from its soil.

International community must take cognizance of the fact that Pakistan is a major victim of terrorism, conducted by state and non state actors. And still, India is pursuing the anti-Pakistan narratives concerning terrorism.   

New Delhi’s various mischievous attempts to hyphenate Pakistan with terrorism have been exposed. In this regard, Indian media also creates frenzy and volley of allegations against Islamabad which are a true reflection of Indian establishment and Hindu mindset which are intolerant to any improvement in the bilateral relations between both the neighboring countries.

Implementing Doval’s scheme, India’s devilish National Investigation Agency (NIA) and RAW have been arranging various subversive acts inside India to shift the blame game to Islamabad like orchestrated drama of Gurdaspur episode, terror boat incident etc. The main aims behind were to defame Pakistan and its security agencies.

It is mentionable in relation to false flag operations conducted by Indian government; a report was carried out by Indian media in 2014. It stated that former home ministry officer R.V.S Mani had submitted signed affidavits in the court, citing member of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)-the Special Investigation Team (SIT)—accused Indian incumbent governments of orchestrating the terror attack on Indian Parliament and the 26/11 carnage in Mumbai.

Indian establishment vis-à-vis Doval has become habitual of organizing false flag operations. They create false alerts and security hype to attract attention of international community. Terror attack at the Indian Air Force Base in Pathankot is another attempt of Doval’s mischievous scheme against Pakistan.

Without any investigation and evidence, since the first day of the Pathankot incident, Indian media and top civil and military officials started claiming that the attackers had arrived from Pakistani Punjab’s Bahawalpur district, and had links with Jaish-e-Mohammad and Pakistan’s primary intelligence agency, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI). But, despite Islamabad’s cooperation with India like formation of the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) consisting of professionals to investigate the Pathankot attack, crackdown against the militant group Jaish-i-Mohammad—lodging of a First Information Report (FIR) in relation to the incident, New Delhi failed in providing any proof of Pakistan’s involvement in the Pathankot episode. In fact, besides fulfilling other sinister designs against Islamabad, New Delhi orchestrated that drama to postpone secretary-level talks with Pakistan, which were scheduled to be held in Islamabad on January 15, 2016.

In fact, Indian authorities failed to provide evidence to Pakistan’s Joint Investigation Team which visited India to probe into Pathankot attack. The JIT members visited Pathankot Airbase on March 29, this year, where Indian National Investigation Agency officials briefed and showed them the route from where the attackers stormed the airbase. As part of the fact-finding task, Pak JIT had asked for handing over swab of four alleged terrorists Nasir Hussain (Punjab), Abu Bakar (Gujranwala) and Umar Farooq and Abdul Qayum (both from Sindh). However, the JIT was provided the DNA reports. The lights along the 24-km perimeter wall of the Pathankot airbase found to be faulty on the eve of the attack. The Pakistani investigators were allowed to enter the military airbase from the narrow adjacent routes instead of main entrance and their duration of the visit was just 55 minutes, enough to take a mere walk through the airbase. The JIT could not collect evidence in this limited time. The visiting team was only informed about the negligence of Boarder Security Force (BSF) and Indian forces. It was disclosed that at the time of the assault, the BSF individuals were sleeping, even though they had been alerted of a possible terror attack 48 hours earlier. 

Meanwhile, a Muslim Officer of the NIA Mohammad Tanzil who was investigating the Pathankot airbase assault was shot dead by two unidentified attackers near his hometown-Bijnor in Uttar Pradesh, when he was returning from a function, as India media also reported on April 3, 2016.

New Delhi’s non-cooperation with Pakistan’s JIT has proved that Indian intelligence agencies, especially RAW has arranged the killing of Mohammad Tanzil who wanted to detect the real culprits of the Pathankot attack. While, as a formality, Indian government has directed to conduct a high level inquiry to know regarding his death.

It is of particular attention that murder of NIA Tanzil Ahmed may be linked up with the killing of police officer Hemant Karkare who was killed by Hindu extremists after he had exposed their involvement (Saffron terror) in the wave of terrorist incidents of 2008 in Malegaon and other India cities.

Undoubtedly, Tanzil Ahmed was also part of the Indian government team to probe Pathankot terror attack. He was punished for having knowledge about the false flag operation at Pathankot and was suspected of sharing the same thing with the Pakistan’s fact-finding team.

Nonetheless, New Delhi is sabotaging the investigation of the Pathonkot terror incident, and is creating hurdles in the fact-finding mission of Islamabad, because India has itself arranged the attack as part of India’s offensive-defensive doctrine which was planned by of Ajeet Doval.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic@yahoo.com


Panama Papers: Main Target is Putin

By Sajjad Shaukat

A massive leak of secret documents from Panama-based law firm Mossack Fonseca, which were released on April 3, this year by the International Consortium of Invistigative Journalists (ICIJ) and German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung allegedly show prominent world leaders, politicians and celebrities who hided millions in secret offshore tax shelters and used offshore accounts to evade tax laws. Some 214,000 offshore entities are connected to the leak documents and people in more than 200 countries and territories. Some countries have announced investigation, while in some countries, the opposition parties and the people are conducting protests in relation to the revelations of corruption, money laundering, and financial secrecy in relation to their nations.

Iceland’s Prime Minister Sigmundar Davio Gunnlaugsson and Ukrainian Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk resigned in wake of protests and political pressure inside their countries regarding the revelations of the so-called Panama Papers. However, without any evidence, verdict by any court and completion of investigation about tax-evasion or secret offshore business, they resigned to save their country from political crisis. Ukrainian Prime Minister Yatsenyuk himself statef that he was resigning to save the country from political crisis, as the Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko was named in the so-called Panama Papers scandal.

British Prime Minister David Cameron is facing increasing calls to resign in wake of public protests after he admitted that he profited from his father’s offshore trust.

As regards Russia, the leaked files said that Russian cellist Sergei Roldugin was a front man for a network of Putin who moved some $2 billion through offshore networks.

President Putin dismissed these false allegations, noted that “none of the accusations were aimed at him directly, because he was not named in the papers, even if the international coverage has focused on him.”  

A close friend who was named in the leaked Papers, Roldugin was at the center of a scheme to hide money from Russian state banks which had no connections with Putin.

While, the truth is that Roldugin used the money, he earned as a minority shareholder of a Russian company to buy rare musical instruments abroad and hand them over to the Russian state, as Putin said. Without publicizing himself, he also has worked to organize concerts to promote Russian culture abroad and effectively paid his own money for that, the more people like him we have, the better. And “I’m proud to have friends like him”, Putin remarked.

Russian President Putin described the accusations as part of the US-led disinformation campaign waged against Russia in order to weaken its government. He elaborated, “They are trying to destabilize us from within in order to make us more compliant…Russia deprives the West of its monopoly on economic and military power, which irks the West…attempts are made to weaken us from…what is the easiest way of doing this? It is to spread distrust for the ruling authorities and the bodies of power within society and to set people against each other.”
Putin added, WikiLeaks had described the leaked Panamanian documents as an American-funded plot…we now know from WikiLeaks that officials and state agencies in the United States are behind all this.”

Although Panama Papers have motioned the names of various renowned rulers to indicate impartiality in collecting the secret data, yet its main target is Russian President Putin which needs appropriate analysis.

Renowned scholars of international relations, Lord Castlereagh, Quincy Wright, Hans J. Morgenthau and Kenneth Waltz agree by remarking, “Checking the unusual dominance and hegemony of the world by a single power is very essential for the survival of other states which live in anarchic situation where there is no international agency to impose international law and to provide security…the concept of balance of power rests with the basic assumption that excessive power in the system is a threat to the existence of other units and that the most antidote to power is power.”

It is notable that after the disintegration of the Soviet Union in 1991, power-vacuum was created in the world. Waltz and other thinkers expected “unipolarity to give way quickly to multipolarity as other major powers of Europe and Asia would move individually and collectively to balance the preponderant power of the United States.”

Unfortunately, other major nuclear powers or any prospective alliance did not challenge America’s hegemony in accordance with the system of balance of power. In that backdrop, the US emerged as the sole superpower in the unipolar world. In consultation with his Zionist-advisers, American former President Bush, (The Senior) replaced the old bipolar order with the New World Order, with the US acting as a kind of global policeman to protect the political and economic interests of Israel and the American Jews who are owners of many big cartels—multinational corporations, oil companies, banks etc., including print and electronic media of the US in particular and the world in general. Thus, by dominating American internal policies, Zionist Jews mould country’s foreign policy for their own interests, devoted to Israel.

In the unipolar world, even the United Nations became an instrument of the US policy to establish American hegemony in the world. The Third World and a majority of Muslim countries ware compelled to realign their domestic policies according to Washington’s dictates. In order to obtain the hidden agenda of Jews, the US imposed its sudden terms of globalization such as free markets, privatization and de-nationalization etc. on the ill-prepared developing countries, which left behind shattered nations and a global financial crisis. It further widened the gape between the poor and the rich countries or G-7 countries. The corporations and international financial institutions like IMF and World Bank which are indirectly controlled by Zionist Jews have continued to drive the project of globalization through the sole superpower.

However, system of balance power is so essential for the world that even alliances and counter-alliances are made to check the dominance of a single state. But, after 9/11, no such alliance was made. Even, almost all the major Western countries including NATO states also joined the global war on terror, when American President George W. Bush warned, “either you are with us or with terrorists.”
Besides, in the name of war on terror, the US and NATO attacked Afghanistan and then without mandate of the UN Security Council, American-Anglo forces invaded Iraq. Like the militants’ brutal tactics, US-led forces also employed state terrorism by special military operations, extra-judicial assassinations and heavy aerial bombardment, which killed several innocent persons especially in Iraq and Afghanistan. And suspected Muslims were also kept in Guantanamo Bay, Abu Graib and other cells, established in some Islamic countries and small European states where personnel of the CIA, the FBI, and the military employed various methods of torture like physical violence and even murder.

Notably, President Barack Obama who had stated during his first election that he would rectify the blunders, committed by his predecessor in the name of war on terror—continued the same in their worst form to secure the illegitimate interests of Israel. Obama-led Administration went on with various techniques of ruthless terror and extrajudicial killings of the innocent persons through illegitimate drone attacks—assisting undemocratic forces, toppling the elected government in Egypt, and like Iraq, creation of more collapsed states such as Libya, Yemen and Syria which opened the doors for Al-Qaeda and ISIS.

If the double game of President Bush franchised Al-Qaeda on global level, President Obama’s dual policy franchised both Al-Qaeda and ISIS as part of the anti-Muslim campaign and left no stone unturned in advancing the agenda of the Zionists, Israeli lobbies and the neoconservatives in the pretext of global war on terror. Secretly, Obama authorized CIA to create ISIS. His perennial covert support to the Israeli atrocities on the Palestinians, silence over the supply (Smuggling) of oil by ISIS to some European countries whose governments have also not taken action against those companies which are exporting oil from the ISIS-controlled regions of Iraq, including CIA-assisted Al-Qaeda (Al-Nusra Front) and ISIS militants to topple the Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s regime might be cited as instance. Thus, the Middle East was deliberately thrown in worst form of terrorism and civil wars.

In this connection, due to his unmatched leadership qualities, President Vladimir Putin first of all stabilized Russian Federation economically. Then, he started checking the hegemony of America  in the unipolar world.

In this respect, in 2013, the US Secretary of State John Kerry accused Syrian President Assad of using chemical weapons in relation to the Syrian civil war. In order to protect the interests of Israel, in the pretext, America was determined to attack Syria like the invasion of Iraq where no weapons of mass destructions were discovered. But, Putin warned western powers against any airstrike. For face-saving, John Kerry withdrew from American stand, as he could not prove it. In fact, CIA-Mossad-supported rebels which have been fighting to oust President Assad’s government had used chemical weapons in Syria.

In 2014, the US-led West imposed sanctions against Russia by accusing Russia of intervention in Ukraine regarding the Crimean crisis. But, Russian President Putin who won over his adversaries owing to his successful diplomacy responded with his country’s sanctions against a number of countries, including a total ban on food imports from the EU, US etc. But, sanctions on Russia badly failed, becoming counterproductive for the West.
In this context, Gilbert Doctorow who is the European Coordinator, American Committee for East-West Accord, Ltd., wrote in January 15, 2016, “The sanctions have been totally useless in changing Russian foreign and military policy in the directions desired by the U.S…they have caused very little damage to the Russian economy, but much harm to immediate European and American economic interests…ultimately will undermine U.S. global hegemony, thereby compromising America’s future.”

It is mentionable after the September 30, 2015, unexpected developments such as Russian successful airstrikes on ISIS targets in the northern Syria and Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, its coalition with Iran, Iraq, Syria and Lebanon-based Hezbollah in support of Syrian President Assad, US Defense Department’s announcement to abandon the goal of training the Syrian rebels, retreat of the CIA-supported rebels and mercenaries after their failure to topple the Assad government, proving links of Al-Qaeda (Al-Nusra Front)  and ISIS with America and Israeli—the first Vienna meeting where the US Secretary of State John Kerry agreed to keep the Syrian president in power, opposite to American policy of regime-change,  not to allow ISIS militants group to reign in Syria, demoralization of the ISIS terrorists and the rebels who are on flee, after the Russia-led coalition reoccupied several territories in Iraq and Syria clearly proved supremacy of military power of Moscow over the US and Western powers (NATO) which were fighting useless war to secure the illegitimate interests of Israel. Thus, Putin also exposed the sinister designs of the US-led West.

While, in wake of some recent developments like UNO-backed ceasefire in Syria, brokered by the major powers including Russia and the US, Russian President Putin gave a surprise by announcing to withdraw most of the forces from Syria, after strengthening the Assad regime whose army has also retaken some territories, especially Palmyra city from ISIS and rebels. Although Putin’s decision was hailed by Obama, UNO and some European leaders, yet they were irritated by Putin’s tactical move.

It is of particular attention that Russia famous TV channel, RT and Veterans Today have shown proof of deliberate smuggling of oil by ISIS to some European countries with official backing of Turkey, and supply of weapons by the US-led entities to the ISIS militants.

Nevertheless, after 14 years of the protracted war against terrorism, a perennial wave of terror attacks on the US and NATO installations and their military personnel by the Taliban in Afghanistan, including those by Al-Qaeda and ISIS on Christians and Muslims in Syria, Iraq, Turkey, Nigeria etc. and elsewhere in the world—sectarian violence and some terror-attacks inside America and Europe deteriorated the global war on terror. Thus, President Obama caused political and economic instability in the world, jeopardizing the American global interests.

Besides, a number of external and internal developments like huge cost of war on terror, financial crisis, and other-related problems which affected American public also enveloped other Western countries.

Particularly, in wake of the presidential election-campaign, American tax-payers have also been criticizing the government of Democrats and CIA for America’s (NATO) longest war in Afghanistan, facing defeatism, useless proxy wars under the cover of global war on terror and US heavy cost of war which caused serious financial crisis, adding to the dilemmas of ordinary Americans.

Therefore, it was the right hour for the Mossack Fonseca to release the so-called Panama Papers, especially to distort the good image of the President Vladimir Putin who has exposed the fake global war on terror and the New World Order agents. Putin rightly contended in relation to the Panama leaks that “Washington has fanned allegations of Russian official corruption in order to weaken Moscow as the U.S. has become concerned about Russia’s growing economic and military might.”

In this regard, Putin’s spokesman Dmitry Peskov denies wife owned offshore companies. Dismissing self-fabricated disclosures contained in the Panama Papers about Russia as “Putinphobia,” Peskov said that journalists investigating the Russian president’s financial affairs had “found out little new…was designed to destabilize the situation in Russia ahead of elections.” He added that the journalistic consortium behind the Panama Papers included “many former state department and CIA employees, as well as those of other intelligence services.”

While, Mossack Fonseca keeps Americans at arm’s length, and have raised the question as to why there are not Americans in the Panama documents. And as to why secret activities of the firm and the journalists did not came to the notice of FBI and CIA whose personnel are equipped with the best technology and facilities to spy over the entire world.

As matter of fact, Putin who unmasked the real face of America and it Western allies is the real target of the Panama files. Therefore, even the leading think-tanks and world’s renowned media houses which are directly and indirectly controlled by the Zionists and Jews have been compelled to indicate truth by pointing out the other side of the coin so as to save their reputation and commercial interests, knowing that otherwise, social media or internet will point out the reality.

In this context, on April 7, 2016, Clifford G. Gaddy, A senior fellow of Foreign Policy, Centre on the United States and Europe wrote on the website of Brooking Institute, under the caption, “Are the Russians actually behind the Panama Papers?”,  “The Panama Papers—does this strike anyone else as a very fishy story? It’s like something out of a cheap spy movie...most reports might obscure a much bigger and more twisted story…despite the headlines, there is no evidence of Putin’s direct involvement—not in any company involved in the leak..there are documents showing that some of his friends have moved up to two billion dollars” through these Panama-based shell companies. But nothing in the Panama Papers reveals anything new about Putin. In recent years…circles in the West sought to use the media to respond to what they described as Russia’s hybrid warfare especially information war…they identified corruption as an issue where Putin was quite vulnerable. It’s worth looking at the Panama Papers in that context: Journalists are targeting Putin far out of proportion to the evidence they present…this information will not harm Putin at all—instead, the leaked data will lead to scandals throughout the West, where corruption does matter—a point I’ll discuss. On net, the Russians win…the potential for using such a leak for political purposes is immense. If “we” (in the United States or the West) released these documents, the motive would apparently be to embarrass Putin. This is part of the fantasy that we can defeat Putin in an information war. If that was the motive, the result is pathetic: No real damage is being done to Putin, but there is collateral damage to U.S. allies…the Panama Paper stories run off Putin like water off a duck’s back. But they have a negative impact on Western stability. So, done right, the last thing anyone would suspect is that the Panama Papers are a Russian operation.”

Even BBC pointed out on April 7, 2016, “None of the money that seems to have flowed from Russia into tax havens belongs to President Putin…while much of the focus has been into the dealings of dictators and corrupt regimes around the world, it seems that Panama is not above helping good old-fashioned robbers…Mossack Fonseca helped launder the millions stolen during the notorious Beink’s Mat gold bullion robbery in of 1983, when three and a half tones of gold disappeared.”

Similarly, The Guardian wrote on April 10, 2016, “In 1903 the US bullied Colombia into giving up the province that became Panama. The plan was to create a nation to serve the interests of Wall Street…the Panamanian state was originally created to function on behalf of the rich and self-seeking of this world–or rather their antecedent in America…Panama was created by the United States for purely selfish commercial reasons, right on that historical hinge between the imminent demise of Britain as the great global empire, and the rise of the new American imperium…Roosevelt acted at the behest of various banking groups, among them JP Morgan & Co, which was appointed as the country’s fiscal agent…the reason, of course control the canal across the Panamanian isthmus that would open in 1914 to connect the world’s two great oceans, and the commerce that sailed them…the canal treaty forbade Colombian troops from landing to suppress it, lest they disturb the free transit of goods…JP Morgan led the American banks in gradually turning Panama into a financial centre–and a haven for tax evasion and money laundering…Panama began to register foreign ships to carry fuel for the Standard Oil company in order for the corporation to avoid US tax liabilities…in 1983, however, the system backfired slightly: General Manuel Noriega took power. For years, he had been a beneficiary of, and functionary for, the CIA, but he came to realize that Panama’s wealth was even better suited to an alliance with the Medellín narco-trafficking cartel of Pablo Escobar. In 1989, therefore, the US returned militarily, as it had eight decades previously, an–as Silverstein puts i–returned to power the old banking elites, heirs of the JP Morgan legacy…[Regarding the money, collected through tax-evasion or corruption] Awan names major American banks that still dominate Wall Street…we do it in probably a smaller way, but every bank does it…Panama is one of the world’s sleaziest tax havens, it is just part of a bigger global system.”

It is noteworthy that the news about the Panama Papers was in the English-language Global Times, a state-run tabloid. The Western media has taken control of the interpretation each time—there has been such a document dump, and the US has demonstrated particular influence in it. Information that is negative to the US can always be minimized, while exposure of non-Western leaders, such as Putin, can get extra spin.

Nonetheless, in order to show impartial approach, and to fulfill formality, the released documents of the Mossack Fonseca have mentioned some 600 Israeli companies and 850 Israeli shareholders which serve to conceal ownership of assets. But, no key rulers or key politician was indicated in the papers. While, it also mentioned an Iranian state oil company, Petropars, which was blacklisted by the US. The firm was registered in the British Virgin Islands. The Panamanian law firm also serviced another Iranian outfit called Petrocom. Leaked emails suggested that its ultimate owner was Iranian former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. In fact, Amadinejad was true leader who openly and straightforwardly supported the cause of Muslims and Palestinians by exposing sinister designs of the US and Zionist Jews.

To display its neutrality so that people believe in the Panama documents, the pro-American king of Saudi Arabia, and the president of Ukraine and the family of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif were also targeted, while the cousin and brothers of Syrian President Assad were said to have a string of offshore companies with Mossack Fonseca.

If we look at those who leaked the information, the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists and who are their funders, we get a clearer picture. Funders include Ford Foundation, Carnegie Endowment, Rockefeller Family Fund, Open Society Foundation (George Soros) All Jewish billionaires and same groups funding color revolutions around the world aimed at destabilizing and regime change. Anti-Putin sentiment has reached boiling point in the West, and that to a large degree makes it next to impossible to talk about Russia in a positive manner.

Returning to our central discussion, Panama Papers are a CIA-supported conspiracy against Russia and its main target is Putin who has become a hero by exposing the hidden aims of the regimes in America and Israel which have thrown the world into greater instability to complete the Zionist-agenda of global dominance, and which are even affecting the Muslims, Christians and peace-loving Jews, and are even backfiring on the loyalist Americans.

Sajjad Shaukat writes on international affairs and is author of the book: US vs Islamic Militants, Invisible Balance of Power: Dangerous Shift in International Relations

Email: sajjad_logic_pak@hotmail.com

Courtesy Veterans Today